We could ask that person what she is talking about specifically.
EDIT: I went down a list of replies and one of them asked this. Twitter prompted me to click to view replies, and when I did, there were NO replies. I think Twitter may have censored the answer.
Depends what you did. If your posts should be admissible in court. Then you are guilty.
I really despise loaded questions like yours.
OK let me make it plain.
A hot take Tweet with no info is a fucking waste of time.
We could ask that person what she is talking about specifically.
EDIT: I went down a list of replies and one of them asked this. Twitter prompted me to click to view replies, and when I did, there were NO replies. I think Twitter may have censored the answer.
onus is on you to disprove it
I disagree. The originator should be able to back up what they write.
i disagree, it's common sense now and no need to rely on man links to prove it