Usually I can 93.56% understand your posts, and do enjoy this one. But this time........dafuq bruhhh? :D All love bro, but can u maybe simplify this one? Rothschild are blood protectors? the khazarian blood?
...represents standing under suggested information; hence ignoring source (perceived inspiration).
But this time........dafuq bruhhh?
Direct adaption to perceived inspiration (choice to balance) confuses those who seek to understand suggested information (choice to choice).
All love bro, but can u maybe simplify this one?
I'm always working on simplicity (perception) over complexity (suggestion); but I cannot suggest others to adapt to perceived without tempting with suggestions.
Rothschild are blood protectors? the khazarian blood?
One cannot shape a word out of a moving system; without using the moving system to shape the word. The shaped word represents suggestion; while the moving system represents perception. "rothschild" and "bauer" represents suggested words to tempt others to ignore the perceived underneath aka the expression of the moving system.
ROTH (red; blood) SCHILD (shield; defense)...when one comprehends flow/form, and then applies implication upon perceived "blood; defense", then one can comprehend self sustenance of form through resistance to the velocity of flow. Blood also implies propagation of self from one to another; while self sustenance implies energy as the foundation. If you then add BAUER (farmer; cultivator of leased ground) one can comprehend that leased ground represents temporary form, and that cultivation by farmer represents shaping by suggestion.
In short...resistance for self sustenance (rothschild) and exploiting the ignorance thereof (bauer). You view these words as suggested brands; which allows others to define; redefine and contradict the suggested meaning; which as the OP shows; leads to complex his-story narratives about the rothschild and whatever bastards spawned from them. That all represents temptation to ignore the ongoing system which doesn't suggest any brands.
Question suggested words; brands; idols (information) as a price-tag upon a free within all system (inspiration)? You gonna pay for ignoring the highest value (free will of choice aka evaluation) for suggested price-tags by others; starting with the devaluation of your choice.
As for the whole blood thing...propagation of self aka that which remains of temporary within ongoing, and propagation represents growth (form) through resistance to loss (flow). The red-cross blood monopoly represents an effort to accumulate from the many; distribute among the few, and preventing growth of the many with whatever works temporarily (mixing; poisoning; watering down; selective breeding; even withholding from transmutation, hence keeping it alive; yet not utilizing it for the sustenance of life).
I get that all. Especially the "brand" thing. As our "selves" are linked on a much larger scale with our oversouls. We are virtually just fighting eachother and our own selves in doing so.
Free will is something that "they" cannot alter. But here is the counter to this. When "they" controll "all" of the institutions of knowledge and Gnosis. Are they not "altering free will". As MANY may not interpet "source, spirit," Our selves, as the real deal, we would get called and labelled. By the very institutions "they" created. Did this make sense? If not sorry for the rambling incoherency
As our "selves" are linked on a much larger scale with our oversouls
Large represents whole (ALL); little represents less than whole (ONE)...ALL represents ONE in energy.
OVER (impressed perception) UNDER (compressed comprehension) SOUL; SPIRIT (expression of under within over).
We are virtually just fighting eachother and our own selves in doing so.
ONE ignores ONEness. "we" represents self segregation of ONEness as inspiration for ONE to sustain self. "two" doesn't represent a perceivable state; it is caused by suggesting to count other ONEs; which isn't needed to be ONE.
Free will is something that "they" cannot alter.
AL'TER, verb transitive [Latin another.]; hence others representing suggested temptation (want) and perceived inspiration (need) for you as the choice at the center of balance (need/want). The more one ignores this; the more are others tempted to utilize suggestion for parasitic exploitation.
When "they" controll "all" of the institutions of knowledge and Gnosis. Are they not "altering free will"
Knowledge represents "to perceive inspiration"; while all the institutions under the suggested label "knowledge" aka SCIENCE; noun (Latin scio; to know) as scientism, represent temporary form (information); not ongoing flow (inspiration).
It's free will of choice to choose wanting scientism (suggested information) over needed science (perceived inspiration). ONE exists within ALL Gnosis; while others are tempting with institutionalized INTEL'LIGENCE, noun [Latin intelligentia, from intelligo, to understand aka standing under suggested information).
The sleight of hand for the latter represents "Intel Inside" aka intelligence inside; knowledge outside. Gotta compress the impressed to express yourself or as Madonna suggested: "Express yourself, don't repress yourself"..."And I'm not sorry"..."It's human nature"..."I'm not your bitch, don't hang your shit on me (it's human nature)".
In short...shaping free will by suggestion; still requires free will to consent to the suggestion.
As MANY may not interpret "source, spirit,"
Because they each choose want (suggested) over need (perceived); hence ignoring both source (of perceived) and thereby adaptation (spirit; spiro; to breathe) to the source (as those perceiving within).
Now we are tempted to blame them for ones lack of growth; which the few have also industrialized among the many as reasoning aka want vs not want, so you always have others to blame for not wanting what you want; while you both ignore need.
Our selves, as the real deal, we would get called and labelled
Aka the messiah allegory aka the anointed one who redeems all the other ones. Ain't gonna happen boys; cause you gonna kill em when he points out your ignorance. Why? Because it's easier to blame others; than to confront self.
By the very institutions "they" created.
All these institutions are managing the self destruction of the many by ignorance (choice of want over need). You are surrounded by ignorant behavior, and that behavior is ruthlessly farmed. Attacking the farm gets you the farmer with the shotgun response (who utilize the cattle against you), while you represent the guy going "the grass is always greener on the other side of the fence"; yet so very few are inspired to struggle for self sustenance; when they're surrounded by convenience. "that's not convenience; it's designed to kill you"...will be met with much hostility and a little praise here and there; neither of which helps you much.
Did this make sense?
Sensing represents perceiving aka responding to perceivable. We don't make perception; we exist within it; in response to it, so ALL makes sense for each ONE within. How much of ALL each ONE can utilize depends on adaptation; resistance; growth; comprehension; potential...choice.
If not sorry for the rambling incoherency
ONE cannot express ALL wrong. IN (within) COHERENT (united, unitas; oneness). Keep expressing from your perspective and you will become more and more familiar about how to do it.
Usually I can 93.56% understand your posts, and do enjoy this one. But this time........dafuq bruhhh? :D All love bro, but can u maybe simplify this one? Rothschild are blood protectors? the khazarian blood?
...represents standing under suggested information; hence ignoring source (perceived inspiration).
Direct adaption to perceived inspiration (choice to balance) confuses those who seek to understand suggested information (choice to choice).
I'm always working on simplicity (perception) over complexity (suggestion); but I cannot suggest others to adapt to perceived without tempting with suggestions.
One cannot shape a word out of a moving system; without using the moving system to shape the word. The shaped word represents suggestion; while the moving system represents perception. "rothschild" and "bauer" represents suggested words to tempt others to ignore the perceived underneath aka the expression of the moving system.
ROTH (red; blood) SCHILD (shield; defense)...when one comprehends flow/form, and then applies implication upon perceived "blood; defense", then one can comprehend self sustenance of form through resistance to the velocity of flow. Blood also implies propagation of self from one to another; while self sustenance implies energy as the foundation. If you then add BAUER (farmer; cultivator of leased ground) one can comprehend that leased ground represents temporary form, and that cultivation by farmer represents shaping by suggestion.
In short...resistance for self sustenance (rothschild) and exploiting the ignorance thereof (bauer). You view these words as suggested brands; which allows others to define; redefine and contradict the suggested meaning; which as the OP shows; leads to complex his-story narratives about the rothschild and whatever bastards spawned from them. That all represents temptation to ignore the ongoing system which doesn't suggest any brands.
Question suggested words; brands; idols (information) as a price-tag upon a free within all system (inspiration)? You gonna pay for ignoring the highest value (free will of choice aka evaluation) for suggested price-tags by others; starting with the devaluation of your choice.
As for the whole blood thing...propagation of self aka that which remains of temporary within ongoing, and propagation represents growth (form) through resistance to loss (flow). The red-cross blood monopoly represents an effort to accumulate from the many; distribute among the few, and preventing growth of the many with whatever works temporarily (mixing; poisoning; watering down; selective breeding; even withholding from transmutation, hence keeping it alive; yet not utilizing it for the sustenance of life).
I get that all. Especially the "brand" thing. As our "selves" are linked on a much larger scale with our oversouls. We are virtually just fighting eachother and our own selves in doing so.
Free will is something that "they" cannot alter. But here is the counter to this. When "they" controll "all" of the institutions of knowledge and Gnosis. Are they not "altering free will". As MANY may not interpet "source, spirit," Our selves, as the real deal, we would get called and labelled. By the very institutions "they" created. Did this make sense? If not sorry for the rambling incoherency
Large represents whole (ALL); little represents less than whole (ONE)...ALL represents ONE in energy.
OVER (impressed perception) UNDER (compressed comprehension) SOUL; SPIRIT (expression of under within over).
ONE ignores ONEness. "we" represents self segregation of ONEness as inspiration for ONE to sustain self. "two" doesn't represent a perceivable state; it is caused by suggesting to count other ONEs; which isn't needed to be ONE.
AL'TER, verb transitive [Latin another.]; hence others representing suggested temptation (want) and perceived inspiration (need) for you as the choice at the center of balance (need/want). The more one ignores this; the more are others tempted to utilize suggestion for parasitic exploitation.
Knowledge represents "to perceive inspiration"; while all the institutions under the suggested label "knowledge" aka SCIENCE; noun (Latin scio; to know) as scientism, represent temporary form (information); not ongoing flow (inspiration).
It's free will of choice to choose wanting scientism (suggested information) over needed science (perceived inspiration). ONE exists within ALL Gnosis; while others are tempting with institutionalized INTEL'LIGENCE, noun [Latin intelligentia, from intelligo, to understand aka standing under suggested information).
The sleight of hand for the latter represents "Intel Inside" aka intelligence inside; knowledge outside. Gotta compress the impressed to express yourself or as Madonna suggested: "Express yourself, don't repress yourself"..."And I'm not sorry"..."It's human nature"..."I'm not your bitch, don't hang your shit on me (it's human nature)".
In short...shaping free will by suggestion; still requires free will to consent to the suggestion.
Because they each choose want (suggested) over need (perceived); hence ignoring both source (of perceived) and thereby adaptation (spirit; spiro; to breathe) to the source (as those perceiving within).
Now we are tempted to blame them for ones lack of growth; which the few have also industrialized among the many as reasoning aka want vs not want, so you always have others to blame for not wanting what you want; while you both ignore need.
Aka the messiah allegory aka the anointed one who redeems all the other ones. Ain't gonna happen boys; cause you gonna kill em when he points out your ignorance. Why? Because it's easier to blame others; than to confront self.
All these institutions are managing the self destruction of the many by ignorance (choice of want over need). You are surrounded by ignorant behavior, and that behavior is ruthlessly farmed. Attacking the farm gets you the farmer with the shotgun response (who utilize the cattle against you), while you represent the guy going "the grass is always greener on the other side of the fence"; yet so very few are inspired to struggle for self sustenance; when they're surrounded by convenience. "that's not convenience; it's designed to kill you"...will be met with much hostility and a little praise here and there; neither of which helps you much.
Sensing represents perceiving aka responding to perceivable. We don't make perception; we exist within it; in response to it, so ALL makes sense for each ONE within. How much of ALL each ONE can utilize depends on adaptation; resistance; growth; comprehension; potential...choice.
ONE cannot express ALL wrong. IN (within) COHERENT (united, unitas; oneness). Keep expressing from your perspective and you will become more and more familiar about how to do it.
protectors of there ancient bloodline