I saw no violation so far. I did see people saying he did with stupid examples. It's like they're not just waiting for him to mess up, willing to help him mess up.
Nah this is common. If he disparages it it could drive down price and reduce his cost of acquisition this it's considered market manipulation at this point
"The deal could still fall apart if blocked by regulators or if Musk fails to deliver on the equity component of the transaction. He is in talks with a number of wealthy individuals and institutional investors about backing that portion of his bid, said people briefed on the negotiations."
i dont trust it either, probably designed to distract the sheep so they don't ask why planes and fires keep taking out food processing plants
I saw no violation so far. I did see people saying he did with stupid examples. It's like they're not just waiting for him to mess up, willing to help him mess up.
This one with the accusations of accusing someone : https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1519151823831060481
This one saying this post calls Twitter inferior to Truth: https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1519179787163652099
Nah this is common. If he disparages it it could drive down price and reduce his cost of acquisition this it's considered market manipulation at this point
Though, from what I've read, nothing could be used as proof in a court case. All the language is vague, but those it targets know the point.
Yeah I'm not saying he did anything wrong just that the non disparagement clause is common
Quoting FT.com
If you, mostly cuckservatives, want to get to the truth, first you need to abandon all hope.
False hope, makes you same as these degenerate leftoids you dont like...
Jumping for that small particle of hope like a trained dog.