We simulated a spectrum of patterns of mixing between vaccinated and unvaccinated groups
So they didn't actually study anything. They took some data, ran it through a model based on totally unbiased assumptions, and it turns out everything is in line with what Public Health would like it to be (whom they coincidentally work for).
At this point the question is not "Can I trust this study?" but "Can I trust any study?"
We already knew the vaxxed had higher viral loads, and worse outcomes. This is just another attempt at making it the unvaxxed fault rather than a product failure.
So they didn't actually study anything. They took some data, ran it through a model based on totally unbiased assumptions, and it turns out everything is in line with what Public Health would like it to be (whom they coincidentally work for).
At this point the question is not "Can I trust this study?" but "Can I trust any study?"
Totally unbiased model, bro...
source
cdc, fda, nih, hhs, pfizer, moderna, astrazeneca, governments that pushed it around the world....many more
Look what I found on GLP:
https://imgur.com/79BsDXd
They do disclose it in the study. One of the other authors, Ashleigh Tuite, works or worked for Public Health.
Regardless, it's extremely biased.
We already knew the vaxxed had higher viral loads, and worse outcomes. This is just another attempt at making it the unvaxxed fault rather than a product failure.
Cute. But, I didn't know. Perhaps other didn't.
David Fisman worked for WEF.
Well, what do you know!
Is there even a "covid" with actual symptoms?
At this point, they can do and say anything.
Can unvaxxed catch the VAIDS from a vaxxed chick? That’s the question
The first and only vaccine that doesn't protect you from the virus. Amazing.
so the schotz don't work then? --lolz