I repeat, what I am seeing now is a cascading collapse straight back to the same type of insanity that struck Ancient Medieval Europe or the world in the 1930s.
In other words, BILLIONS will die in this decade, and I didn't meant "Vaccine Thanos snap".
I meant the same type of stuff as Soviet Russia, Nazi Germany, Communist China, Pol Pot or the Rwandan Genocide.
Soros, Bill Gates, Fauci etc are still being some of the longest living and happiest people in the world.
Censorship in the internet is RAMPING UP as I type this.
(And if you believe Yandex or Russia in general is your friend, remember the Russians WILL kill you on the big day.)
All the while when Elites basically become Gods who not only tell you how to live, but also tell you you can no longer live.
It's funny that people still have hope. Everyone is desperate now and will be in the future.
Watch when "decentralized groups" take out the elites and the world becomes filled with broken people waiting to kill or be killed.
THIIIIS far gone.
A downward spiral to complete extinction or inhumanity.
Suggestion: "You gonna die"
Comprehension: "I'm alive until then"
a) to be implies out of, so absence of individual still implies within whole.
b) to save implies by choice; yet choice implies within balance. Can choice save balance; when choice represents the responding center of balance?
c) E'DEN, noun [Heb. pleasure, delight.] aka temptation (want) to ignore responsibility (need). The whole getting kicked out of eden allegory represents the consequences of falling for temptation (want over need) kicking one in the ass to inspire responsibility (need over want).
"we" aka suggested conformity is what tempts unity (Latin unitas) - "the state of being one; oneness" to ignore the sustenance of self. The many still fall for the same trick..."we need to come together to help oneself"...that's a contradiction.
"it begins" implies inception; which implies towards death; which implies being alive in the momentum (balance) thereof as the responding choice. That response-ability of choice within balance represents self sustenance aka "helping oneself"...not the suggested choices of others.
a) notice that drowning (as form within flow) requires struggle (adaptation). Notice also that drowning is easier (temptation) than staying alive (struggle). What if the struggle requires resisting the temptations?
b) Person aka per sonos (by sound)...where can one by sound; out of sound; within sound and in response to sound drown within?