"The source also said that some 500 Ukrainian servicemen had crossed the border at various times, adding: "We did not give much publicity to that. We just returned all those willing to return to Ukrainian territory at safe places."
Ah, yes. The good old “they did it too, even though we have no evidence of it and nobody reported on it at the time — just trust us bro.” Pretty weird for a user on a conspiracy forum, to be taking state-actor reporting without any extrinsic evidence at face value.
In any event, the sources clearly show that Russian troops were operating in Donbass years prior to present, which OP’s article says is not the case.
. . . but it’s from a different person in the article. Your quote is from the Russian defense ministry, whereas the Russian troops were captured by the Ukrainian defense ministry.
Curious how you don’t actually attack anything in the sources — just the source itself. That’s called an ad hominem, my friend.
Also, that PDF is from the exact same organization that OP’s article cites repeatedly. Logically, your attack should apply equally to OP’s article — yet, you make no point of that. Again, curious.
Almost like your mindlessly pushing a narrative or something.
Wrong and wrong. Even the OSCE — which the author himself cites for the above proposition — has found that Russian troops were operating within Donbass well before 2022.
Pretty ironic for Stone to criticize the campaign against disinformation, then publish an article with outright lies.
WAH!
"The source also said that some 500 Ukrainian servicemen had crossed the border at various times, adding: "We did not give much publicity to that. We just returned all those willing to return to Ukrainian territory at safe places."
Ah, yes. The good old “they did it too, even though we have no evidence of it and nobody reported on it at the time — just trust us bro.” Pretty weird for a user on a conspiracy forum, to be taking state-actor reporting without any extrinsic evidence at face value.
In any event, the sources clearly show that Russian troops were operating in Donbass years prior to present, which OP’s article says is not the case.
LMFAO... It's from the same article you posted about the wandering Russians... Fuck outta here!
REEEEEEEE
'Lmao' 'REEEEE'
Get back to blacked.com where you belong
Yup, it’s from the same article . . .
. . . but it’s from a different person in the article. Your quote is from the Russian defense ministry, whereas the Russian troops were captured by the Ukrainian defense ministry.
Nice reading comprehension there Einstein.
"But but but but" WAH!
using rueters and the bbc then linking to a pdf. Fuck off glow nigger shill.
Curious how you don’t actually attack anything in the sources — just the source itself. That’s called an ad hominem, my friend.
Also, that PDF is from the exact same organization that OP’s article cites repeatedly. Logically, your attack should apply equally to OP’s article — yet, you make no point of that. Again, curious.
Almost like your mindlessly pushing a narrative or something.
lmao reddit faggot speak