It is pretty sus that he only hit people in the legs. But, assuming the shooting was real and that he did in fact aim at the legs, then that could actually explain the miss rate. If you lined up people in front of you, only one layer thick, and then started randomly shooting towards their legs, you could expect to hit about 1/3 of the time. Unless they were all fat and their calves/thighs were pretty wide, you would be pointing at about 2/3 empty space and 1/3 leg mass.
Don't worry, the van was rented by good ole John Doe #2. Nothing to see here.
It is pretty sus that he only hit people in the legs. But, assuming the shooting was real and that he did in fact aim at the legs, then that could actually explain the miss rate. If you lined up people in front of you, only one layer thick, and then started randomly shooting towards their legs, you could expect to hit about 1/3 of the time. Unless they were all fat and their calves/thighs were pretty wide, you would be pointing at about 2/3 empty space and 1/3 leg mass.
every single time brother
Just a set up for the 18th...
Operation Looking Glass
Hope I'm wrong.
Carry On!!
Also: Don't these attacks keep happening in the 13th of each month. 🤔
He was probably holding the glock sideways with his eyes closed the whole time. It’s how theyz dooze its.
33?
Where have I seen that number before?
Google Frank James 1881