No law of the jungle? The beast is your nation now. The Bible even describes nations as beasts, and we are warned about worshiping the beast in the last days. We are required to reject that beast (nation) that claims to rule over us.
The Romans conquered and enslaved their neighbors, that is a beast preying upon another. As Christians we are called to not live "by the sword" i.e. by conquest.
And Jesus was God. God created nature, and what God decrees is natural
If the animal kingdom is your guide you become like the Freemason, who is condemned. He looks to "mother nature" to justify his depravity. This is a fallen world.
And you claim I'm providing nothing, while you yourself are making a scripture-less argument. I made reference to two very important figures who had wives outside their race in the Bible and I'm sure they weren't the last (I'm just not a great Biblical scholar, but I know what I need to know to cite here).
You are arguing from your own personal preferences, but you have no right to force that on others or shame others for making a choice of whom they marry within the faith. If you were judging by the spirit ("this person is not a Christian therefore they should marry") you are in line with scripture. Otherwise no, you are simply enforcing your own preferences, simple as that.
I only follow mother nature for dietary choices, beyond that I look to my God given conscience, scripture and prayer.
No law of the jungle? The beast is your nation now. The Bible even describes nations as beasts, and we are warned about worshiping the beast in the last days. We are required to reject that beast (nation) that claims to rule over us.
The Romans conquered and enslaved their neighbors, that is a beast preying upon another. As Christians we are called to not live "by the sword" i.e. by conquest.
If the animal kingdom is your guide you become like the Freemason, who is condemned. He looks to "mother nature" to justify his depravity. This is a fallen world.
And you claim I'm providing nothing, while you yourself are making a scripture-less argument. I made reference to two very important figures who had wives outside their race in the Bible and I'm sure they weren't the last (I'm just not a great Biblical scholar, but I know what I need to know to cite here).
You are arguing from your own personal preferences, but you have no right to force that on others or shame others for making a choice of whom they marry within the faith. If you were judging by the spirit ("this person is not a Christian therefore they should marry") you are in line with scripture. Otherwise no, you are simply enforcing your own preferences, simple as that.
I only follow mother nature for dietary choices, beyond that I look to my God given conscience, scripture and prayer.
Try re-reading what I wrote again, and keep the comments from forking off with non-sequiters about who or what is the Beast from revelation.
Ok maybe I'm conflating you with someone else I've been discussing with. Anyway nobody is changing my mind on this unless it's from God himself.
If it's some dipshit named smokratez, I get it.
he's a jew, don't waste your time
So am I though right? Or did I lose my Jewish status today?