Rus troops left Bucha 4 days before allegations appeared
(mobile.twitter.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (21)
sorted by:
Source: Just trust me, comrade
Sources are literally state officials on both sides. If you're screaming "fake news!" then you're calling the mayor of bucha a liar and the entire Ukrainian government liars.
It's just the timeline.
March 31 mayor of bucha issues announcement saying bucha is liberated and there are no Russian troops in the city. April 1 and 2 azov battalion moves into bucha. April 3 allegations of warcrimes.
Here's a tass report on the subject. Russia demands unsc investigation. https://tass.com/politics/1431813?utm_source=moonofalabama.org&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=moonofalabama.org&utm_referrer=moonofalabama.org
Just like Hitler had swiss doctors verify polish aggression but that's not the story we go with today.
If Tass is too Russian for people, here's a pro-Ukraine website celebrating the liberation of Bucha on Mar 31st.
https://www.weareukraine.info/bucha-liberated-from-the-russian-forces/
Thanx for the info, yes that is damning, and all he complains about is Russian mines being left behind, nothing about corpses. First reports of dead peeps on the road i can find is from April 1. Anyway it's tricky, it's a war, you expect to find corpses in a war, that's why wars suck. Ukrainians could have repositioned them for effect or just tied their hands after the fact or they could have been casualties of war because wars are horrible. We are also hearing reports of Ukrainian soldiers attacking Russian speaking Ukrainians. The worst kinds of behaviors and people often come out during war time.
He suddenly remembered a week later.
I guess someone said "or the next bullet is yours"
https://m.censor.net/en/news/3332119/90_of_killed_inhabitants_of_bucha_were_shot_mayor_fedoruk
you can literally look up a SHIT TON OF SOURCES these days for yourself. lazy ass x(
Citation is the responsibility of those making claims.
It was cited in the original tweet. Are you having trouble reading?
I did not address the original tweet. I was talking to u/Skyrison who asserted that readers should follow up on material themselves rather than people citing sources.
your responsibility to also do research. its not hard
How am I supposed to know what you are basing your claims upon? I might read four sources that say something different. We also need to take into account the quality of where you are getting your information.
It is generally accepted that people claiming things show their work.
There's sources in the tweet.
You rather believe what jews tell you?