Yea right. Who buys this. Doesn't it simply prove somebody else isn't in the Ukraine.
(www.theguardian.com)
Comments (5)
sorted by:
Hate this bullshit war.
If Russia didn't care about warcrimes. Why isn't that S400-500 coverage blowing up flights in and out. You think they would right? The airspace is hostile.
Is this the start of a no fly zone.
None of the above it didn't happen there. They imaged it in. Or Zelenskyy isn't in the Ukraine.
Stealth or flying under radar isn't worth the risk. Neither is travelling to Kiev while potential missiles are striking it.
But the fake news are nothing but liars. Getting so sick of it.
Look at that down vote. There is a conspiracy here. It didn't happen like this press has claimed. Not even on marginal odds. Tell me what happened?
If it did it means, boots on the ground and no fly zones. But it didn't happen.
As a voter would you vote for that? The fate of the UK left to chance. Because it has a fool in office. It risks themself over office. Huge blow back if it wasn't so fucking douched. Guys believe in the moon landing. Right.
Imagine thinking whoever is in office makes a difference
Zelenskyy hasn't been operating from the Ukraine for quite some time. It definitely wasn't Kiev. Meanwhile the British media have been lying at every opportunity. A combination of both.
But it's the direct implication caused by this. There are no hidden meanings. It means direct involvement sooner. Very little margin outside of it. Him being there doesn't matter what Russia does. It means the British army turning up. It leaves no room for debate. He does it anyway, outside of approval. Where afterwards it might go through Parliament on the conclusion he's a hero, why aren't any troops. See how easy that was to force support. It's the only strategy being used here. Churchill's playbook. Nevermind how he got there. He didn't. But it's a fact. If he is, why aren't the army he just used.
Look https://www.businessinsider.com/russia-strikes-ukrainian-airbase-destroying-aircraft-and-ammo-depot-reports-2022-4?
So responsible. Where it would've taken all those military planes and soldiers securing him passage. Did they? No, but it doesn't matter. Not even on marginal odds, has he gone over there to Kiev. But the media have created the opinion that he has. No sooner, obviously it might take some more or less propaganda, another warcrime, or not, or whatever, and it will go through parliament. They have his approval, he's done it.
The problem is nobody is honest. There is no debate outside of trolls on social media who attack anybody smart enough to call out the lies. Then it just bans you for questioning them.
I highly suspect you're right. I think these stories are manufactured for no other reason than to reinforce the "Z slugging it out from a bunker in Kiev" fantasy.
Fancy room. Maybe Z stopped by No. 10 on the way to his pad in Miami. Then again, maybe they're in Miami.
It's much worse. It is asserting war sooner. Those odds are very probable after this. Direct British involvement. He has landed boots on the ground. It potentially means exactly that. After it moans through parliament.
Despite of the fact that it didn't even occur. It's Churchill optics, same playbook.
But the odds he went there are improbable close to absolutely absurd.
It's obviously still down to approval the media has just convinced. His party allowing it. Obviously what Russia does next. But the Eagle has landed. It means war is expected.