Tired? More than tired. This is a war against America. We are under attack and these people are enemy soldiers. We need an effective response for when enemy soldiers try to kill you.
Thank you for a cogent post naming some of the probable enemies. Also Schwab and Walensky and Schiff. Also Gates, Fauci, Rockefeller, Biden-Harris, Pelosi, McCarthy, Romney, Collins, Cuomo, Newsom, Cosby, Smith, Hanks, Dorsey, to name a few others that come to mind. Let's not leave anyone out.
Conspiracies does attract all kinds, doesn't it? Very well, I affirm wholeheartedly your conspiracy theory that every participant in this cascade except yourself are obviously fake and a psyop. I'll even add to your evidence: I confess that my presence here is wholly subversive, so much so in fact that I'm not even in on the subversion and am unaware of it. How could it be that a lowly anon such as myself could hope to break through the powers that direct what I type and thwart the subversion?
Whoever is doing the subverting (Jesus!), he is exceptionally good at it. I encourage you to press on to get to the bottom of it all.
I realized that the only people who know who is truly the inner circle are God and the inner circle, and you're not God.
Cecil Rhodes, as reported by Carroll Quigley, was anxious that each circle thought it was the innermost and was relatively unaware of any being more inner. You and I would agree that the presentation by which Rhodes was painted as the innermost was also deceptive.
Therefore to say we know who the true instigators are and who are the unwitting accomplices is either ignorant or proof of malevolence. I have no problem making statements of proportionality in my list of Swamp Creatures, but why would you need to downplay some and upplay others on racial lines, and then to count me the same way? You're not fighting The Jews, an entity that does not have any referent; you're fighting Satan, his demons, and those who can be known by their actions to be his followers.
Add: I should also probably call out the Duckspeak (a word I always use pejoratively). We cannot use "Nazi" both to mean our enemies and ourselves at the same time and in the same sense, nor is it useful for OP to call others Nazis and then allow people to say "no we're NatSocs instead".
It's too bad you wish so often to dilute your brand with illogic. It also explains why you have kept creating new personas. The best white nationalism is to start a large family and that cannot be done with constant dilution. I'm off to feed the kids, verbum sat.
Logic (reason) represents conflict (agreement vs disagreement aka want vs not want) caused by consent to suggested brand (-isms). Logic represents ill-comunication (choice vs choice imbalance) over communication (choice to balance response).
creating new personas
a) PERSON; noun (Latin per sonos) - "by sound". Those within sound represent the different entities within the same origin; and choice based response to balance based sound implies resonance (need) or dissonance (want).
b) suggested creation (implies out of nothing) ignores perceived transmutation (out of everything; hence by sound aka different out of same).
c) new cannot be perceived; since coming into being implies out of ongoing.
The best white nationalism
"the best" represents your choice of evaluation; while national-ism represents you ignoring your choice for consent to the suggested choices of others; hence now being within a want (best nationalism) vs not want (worst nationalism) conflict of reason.
to start a large family...
...implies adaption to momentum for the sustenance of self; which requires utilization of free will of choice in response to balance (momentum of motion)...not consent to ignore choice for the suggested -ism by the choices of others.
to call others Nazis and then allow people to say "no we're NatSocs instead".
ALDI aka ALbrecht DIskont and VOKUHILA aka VOrne KUrz HInten LAng. That's how the German language abbreviates; hence NAtional SOzialist aka NASO; not nazi; which stems from ashke-nazi.
an entity that does not have any referent
a) a suggested label (jew) over a perceived label-less system.
b) EN'TITY, noun [Latin entitas.] - "being; existence". To be implies out of; hence within and in response to aka perceiving within perceivable. In other words...every different entity (form) has the same origin (flow).
How to corrupt the comprehension of the entity within the origin? By tricking them to ignore perceived (inspiration) for suggested (information). Entrance label; brand; idol etc. over movement aka suggested words over perceived sound.
Tired? More than tired. This is a war against America. We are under attack and these people are enemy soldiers. We need an effective response for when enemy soldiers try to kill you.
They command armies that are ostensibly ours. In reality we are all living under military occupation.
Thank you for a cogent post naming some of the probable enemies. Also Schwab and Walensky and Schiff. Also Gates, Fauci, Rockefeller, Biden-Harris, Pelosi, McCarthy, Romney, Collins, Cuomo, Newsom, Cosby, Smith, Hanks, Dorsey, to name a few others that come to mind. Let's not leave anyone out.
This post, the comment I am replying to, and the other replies to it comprise what appears to be a fake thread.
Conspiracies does attract all kinds, doesn't it? Very well, I affirm wholeheartedly your conspiracy theory that every participant in this cascade except yourself are obviously fake and a psyop. I'll even add to your evidence: I confess that my presence here is wholly subversive, so much so in fact that I'm not even in on the subversion and am unaware of it. How could it be that a lowly anon such as myself could hope to break through the powers that direct what I type and thwart the subversion?
Whoever is doing the subverting (Jesus!), he is exceptionally good at it. I encourage you to press on to get to the bottom of it all.
I realized that the only people who know who is truly the inner circle are God and the inner circle, and you're not God.
Cecil Rhodes, as reported by Carroll Quigley, was anxious that each circle thought it was the innermost and was relatively unaware of any being more inner. You and I would agree that the presentation by which Rhodes was painted as the innermost was also deceptive.
Therefore to say we know who the true instigators are and who are the unwitting accomplices is either ignorant or proof of malevolence. I have no problem making statements of proportionality in my list of Swamp Creatures, but why would you need to downplay some and upplay others on racial lines, and then to count me the same way? You're not fighting The Jews, an entity that does not have any referent; you're fighting Satan, his demons, and those who can be known by their actions to be his followers.
See a much more balanced view here.
Add: I should also probably call out the Duckspeak (a word I always use pejoratively). We cannot use "Nazi" both to mean our enemies and ourselves at the same time and in the same sense, nor is it useful for OP to call others Nazis and then allow people to say "no we're NatSocs instead".
It's too bad you wish so often to dilute your brand with illogic. It also explains why you have kept creating new personas. The best white nationalism is to start a large family and that cannot be done with constant dilution. I'm off to feed the kids, verbum sat.
Logic (reason) represents conflict (agreement vs disagreement aka want vs not want) caused by consent to suggested brand (-isms). Logic represents ill-comunication (choice vs choice imbalance) over communication (choice to balance response).
a) PERSON; noun (Latin per sonos) - "by sound". Those within sound represent the different entities within the same origin; and choice based response to balance based sound implies resonance (need) or dissonance (want).
b) suggested creation (implies out of nothing) ignores perceived transmutation (out of everything; hence by sound aka different out of same).
c) new cannot be perceived; since coming into being implies out of ongoing.
"the best" represents your choice of evaluation; while national-ism represents you ignoring your choice for consent to the suggested choices of others; hence now being within a want (best nationalism) vs not want (worst nationalism) conflict of reason.
...implies adaption to momentum for the sustenance of self; which requires utilization of free will of choice in response to balance (momentum of motion)...not consent to ignore choice for the suggested -ism by the choices of others.
ALDI aka ALbrecht DIskont and VOKUHILA aka VOrne KUrz HInten LAng. That's how the German language abbreviates; hence NAtional SOzialist aka NASO; not nazi; which stems from ashke-nazi.
a) a suggested label (jew) over a perceived label-less system.
b) EN'TITY, noun [Latin entitas.] - "being; existence". To be implies out of; hence within and in response to aka perceiving within perceivable. In other words...every different entity (form) has the same origin (flow).
How to corrupt the comprehension of the entity within the origin? By tricking them to ignore perceived (inspiration) for suggested (information). Entrance label; brand; idol etc. over movement aka suggested words over perceived sound.
(((Nazis)))
Nazis with all the socilism and death but none of the nationalism
They're what they told us National Socialists were. It was projection the whole time.
Nazis? I thought they were all commies?
when did that narrative change?
they have always been ashkenazis