I also love how there's not a drop of blood on their clothes or on the ground, no burn marks from point blank gunfire, no physical signs of bleedout or trauma. It seems that the real supply crisis shown on the news is that of half-decent crisis actors.
For that matter - and this is an open question to anyone who can point out any source - has there been any kind of conclusive footage of casualties for the past two months? Because so far, in all news sources and social media feeds, I've seen tons upon tons of wrecked vehicles, some demolished buildings, several hours' worth of hazy background explosions... and barely a couple of scratches in terms of personal damage, on otherwise living people. No gore, no blood, no burns - none of the things you'd expect when a crewed vehicle is hit by any kind of heavy ordnance.
Overall, in terms of onscreen human casualties, the whole conflict seems about as sterile as the 80s G.I. Joe cartoons. So I wonder if it's just my impression, or this grand age of information we live in has somehow failed to produce any substantial footage of casualties.
gotta love how all of this footage doesnt have ONE BURN VICTIM AT ALL, despite being "bombed in their apartment buildings" with very high explosive and HOT , big missiles!!!!
not ONEEEEE of these victims are bloodied, burned, or anything at all. you expect me to believe a lady , that was in the proximity of a bomb that was claimed to be no more than 50 yards away that hit a park, had NOTHING HAPPEN TO HER and wasn't even dirty or anything when they interviewed her?! haahhaahha
Once you get a look at actual people dead on a battlefield, you realize just how fake and ghey all the "victims" are in the various psyops. When you see it, you know why soldiers really do not like talking about their battlefield experiences. It's disturbing in a way that can't be described in words, and very alien to normal human existence.
Tell me about it. Even the average car crash leaves enough chunky salsa around to make even seasoned paramedics want to reach for the unsee juice; never mind the kind of nightmares one can find in a war zone.
Thanks for the footage and the respective source - it definitely makes for a great (if gut-churning) demonstration of how wartime casualties actually look like - burn marks, mutilations, and scenes where you can't easily tell where a body ends and wreckage begins.
Overall, whatever else the Russians are doing in Ukraine, the "denazification" part - or at least the extermination of the Azov forces - seems authentic enough.
You know if you are an Ukrainian woman grieving her dead son, it's not likely that when the cameras come by you are going to shout "I am an Ukrainian woman, I am an Ukrainian woman grieving her dead son."
I also love how there's not a drop of blood on their clothes or on the ground, no burn marks from point blank gunfire, no physical signs of bleedout or trauma. It seems that the real supply crisis shown on the news is that of half-decent crisis actors.
For that matter - and this is an open question to anyone who can point out any source - has there been any kind of conclusive footage of casualties for the past two months? Because so far, in all news sources and social media feeds, I've seen tons upon tons of wrecked vehicles, some demolished buildings, several hours' worth of hazy background explosions... and barely a couple of scratches in terms of personal damage, on otherwise living people. No gore, no blood, no burns - none of the things you'd expect when a crewed vehicle is hit by any kind of heavy ordnance.
Overall, in terms of onscreen human casualties, the whole conflict seems about as sterile as the 80s G.I. Joe cartoons. So I wonder if it's just my impression, or this grand age of information we live in has somehow failed to produce any substantial footage of casualties.
gotta love how all of this footage doesnt have ONE BURN VICTIM AT ALL, despite being "bombed in their apartment buildings" with very high explosive and HOT , big missiles!!!!
not ONEEEEE of these victims are bloodied, burned, or anything at all. you expect me to believe a lady , that was in the proximity of a bomb that was claimed to be no more than 50 yards away that hit a park, had NOTHING HAPPEN TO HER and wasn't even dirty or anything when they interviewed her?! haahhaahha
Yeah, there's quite a bit floating around out there. Here's one example: Nazi High Command Dead in Failed Zelensky/CIA Rescue Attempt (warning/graphic)
Once you get a look at actual people dead on a battlefield, you realize just how fake and ghey all the "victims" are in the various psyops. When you see it, you know why soldiers really do not like talking about their battlefield experiences. It's disturbing in a way that can't be described in words, and very alien to normal human existence.
Tell me about it. Even the average car crash leaves enough chunky salsa around to make even seasoned paramedics want to reach for the unsee juice; never mind the kind of nightmares one can find in a war zone.
Thanks for the footage and the respective source - it definitely makes for a great (if gut-churning) demonstration of how wartime casualties actually look like - burn marks, mutilations, and scenes where you can't easily tell where a body ends and wreckage begins.
Overall, whatever else the Russians are doing in Ukraine, the "denazification" part - or at least the extermination of the Azov forces - seems authentic enough.
tv war
You know if you are an Ukrainian woman grieving her dead son, it's not likely that when the cameras come by you are going to shout "I am an Ukrainian woman, I am an Ukrainian woman grieving her dead son."
I heard that the Ukrainians in Kyiv were given orders to shoot looters on sight. Is that correct?