Just as open-mind assumption
-
"social media" was established as a replacement of MSM. I think that NWO felt that MSM will lose it's influence on public, so they need a replacement. Also, they want a better mean of surveillance. So, "project LifeLog" choose than shitty Zuck who was ready to do any disgusting shit for money and help him to build and promote Facebook. The same was done with all "popular" "social media". They even name it "media", like the "mass media" they have to replace
-
There are way less real users of all that Facebooks, Twitters, WhatsApps and other Instagrams than declared. Some real user registers in a "social media". He wish to find some "friends" to talk and read. If it is uncontrolled, he could find real people and that group, talking about their lives and comparing their expirience could eventually come to the very unwanted conclusions.
-
So, to prevent that, for each real user they have dozens of fake accounts who will pose as ordinary people but push the narrative NWO wants. Also, that fake accounts "show example" of sharing personal data for those who fall in that trap.
-
That mechanism rarely was used for something political, initially it was used (or even developed for that purpose) for marketing and advertising. That is how your "social media" feeds instantly began to discuss some new gadget or some other product. That is how that "social media" get an excuse for enormous income they show.
-
I think first political usage of that mechanism was pushing of LGBTXYZ+ agenda decade ago. Fist ultimate heavy use of that shitty "social media" mechanism was coronahoax. You all perfectly remember all that lies from your "social media friends" about "uncle of friend of friend of my friend who don't believe in coronavirus died from it wispering this is not happening". Here we have tons of posts with the proofs of that narrative injections with that "keyphrases" they forgot to change from target to target.
So, all that "social media" really have way less real people surrounded by artificial accounts pushing narratives instead of MSM. It is not even "social", it is a traps for people where they immidiately surrounded by dosens of propagranda and advertising accounts who feed the victim by their crap.
And now I see exactly the same behavour of that international propaganda network.
Let's make an experiment to prove that theory.
Few days ago in Russian segment of "social media" appeared few very distinct "real stories" from "friend of friend of friend" as usual.
-
Tales about awful Russia crimes in Bucha (and only in Bucha despite the dozens of similar small towns and villages was given back to Ukraine) from the mouths of "witnesses friend of friend of friend". Keywords - "movable crematoriums" and "body bags". (interesting, that this movable crematoriums and body bags and new Russian state standard was discussed in the rise of vaccination campaign but all that talks was heavily suppressed by "social media". Seems now they found a "correct" use for that things :) ).
-
Stories about people in something close to military uniform who sending home washing machines and TV's in the offices of logistic companies in Russian towns close to Ukrainian borders. Also told by "social media" friends. Keywors "logistic company, friend who work on reception"
It is spreading in Russian segment really fast, by different accounts in different groups and forums who tell the same story about "friend of friend send a private post/video/whatever".
Interesting, do you already observe the same message flow in western "social media", and if not, how fast it will appear on your side.
PS: For stupid shills - that is not about the content of messages itself, it is about whole princiles of work and real purpose of "social media"
There's people paid to be activists and they spend all day joining groups and shilling propaganda. They sort of attack the same idea all at once to create opportunities for politicians to create new regulations. Their goal is to get the normies to start repeating their lies then they lock it in using laws
I think each of them have dozens if not hundreds of fake accounts. If they paid and work 8 hours a day, I think it is absolutely possible to actively and plausible manage dozens of accounts and have much more "bot-like" accounts as periodically maintained.
So, for one real user there are at least few such actively managed accounts and tens of "bot-like" accounts.
I could see this happening. China doing this too tons of pictures of them farming in backs of phones
from my personal experience, 60-70% of the users are Indian dudes pretending to be white woman.
Hello, I am RahJa from "medicare provider" how are you doing today? We just called to find out have you got your card yet?
The implication is that these websites deliberately fake user counts to make them appear more attractive. Big sites have already admitted to doing that. It is not illegal.
In school they taught us to pad customer numbers and invoice numbers to give the illusion that your company is more experienced than it really is.
I was reading through OAN's lawsuit against AT&T and Direct TV, and they mentioned that they are now individually tailoring ads to the viewer. So if you watch some TV (let's say you are a liberal watching CNN) the ads you see will be different than your neighbor (let's say you are a conservative watching CNN by accident). This means they can for example target a get out the vote ad to go to mostly Democrats. I bet most people don't know this is going on with TV.