Just as open-mind assumption
-
"social media" was established as a replacement of MSM. I think that NWO felt that MSM will lose it's influence on public, so they need a replacement. Also, they want a better mean of surveillance. So, "project LifeLog" choose than shitty Zuck who was ready to do any disgusting shit for money and help him to build and promote Facebook. The same was done with all "popular" "social media". They even name it "media", like the "mass media" they have to replace
-
There are way less real users of all that Facebooks, Twitters, WhatsApps and other Instagrams than declared. Some real user registers in a "social media". He wish to find some "friends" to talk and read. If it is uncontrolled, he could find real people and that group, talking about their lives and comparing their expirience could eventually come to the very unwanted conclusions.
-
So, to prevent that, for each real user they have dozens of fake accounts who will pose as ordinary people but push the narrative NWO wants. Also, that fake accounts "show example" of sharing personal data for those who fall in that trap.
-
That mechanism rarely was used for something political, initially it was used (or even developed for that purpose) for marketing and advertising. That is how your "social media" feeds instantly began to discuss some new gadget or some other product. That is how that "social media" get an excuse for enormous income they show.
-
I think first political usage of that mechanism was pushing of LGBTXYZ+ agenda decade ago. Fist ultimate heavy use of that shitty "social media" mechanism was coronahoax. You all perfectly remember all that lies from your "social media friends" about "uncle of friend of friend of my friend who don't believe in coronavirus died from it wispering this is not happening". Here we have tons of posts with the proofs of that narrative injections with that "keyphrases" they forgot to change from target to target.
So, all that "social media" really have way less real people surrounded by artificial accounts pushing narratives instead of MSM. It is not even "social", it is a traps for people where they immidiately surrounded by dosens of propagranda and advertising accounts who feed the victim by their crap.
And now I see exactly the same behavour of that international propaganda network.
Let's make an experiment to prove that theory.
Few days ago in Russian segment of "social media" appeared few very distinct "real stories" from "friend of friend of friend" as usual.
-
Tales about awful Russia crimes in Bucha (and only in Bucha despite the dozens of similar small towns and villages was given back to Ukraine) from the mouths of "witnesses friend of friend of friend". Keywords - "movable crematoriums" and "body bags". (interesting, that this movable crematoriums and body bags and new Russian state standard was discussed in the rise of vaccination campaign but all that talks was heavily suppressed by "social media". Seems now they found a "correct" use for that things :) ).
-
Stories about people in something close to military uniform who sending home washing machines and TV's in the offices of logistic companies in Russian towns close to Ukrainian borders. Also told by "social media" friends. Keywors "logistic company, friend who work on reception"
It is spreading in Russian segment really fast, by different accounts in different groups and forums who tell the same story about "friend of friend send a private post/video/whatever".
Interesting, do you already observe the same message flow in western "social media", and if not, how fast it will appear on your side.
PS: For stupid shills - that is not about the content of messages itself, it is about whole princiles of work and real purpose of "social media"
I could see this happening. China doing this too tons of pictures of them farming in backs of phones