It's actually scary that every local treats this "fifth wave" in Hong Kong as a pandemic instead of a coordinated plan to take the spoils for the Great Reset. Media keeps telling us there is a pandemic. If I don't wear a mask, passerby treat me like vermin.
I repeat...THE "COVID-19" PATHOGEN DOES NOT EXIST and:
- I am 99.9% sure that the hospital beds are taken away to "create shortages" or they just flood the hospitals with infectees
- There are no samples for a virus called "covid-19"
- The PCR tests are Russian roulettes that allow reality warping
- The "Asymptomatic cases" means the globalists can control your fate wherever they like.
By this point, I realized it. In a local spectrum, I am completely powerless and can only laugh at how puny my existence is in front of mass formation psychosis and fate.
And the only reason why no human being I ran into personally is in this level of despair and could maintain their cheery optimism is because they do not see what is in store for them. I DID NOT encounter more than 10 locals who do.
I bet that if they all saw what awaits them, since there is no way to stop the total control from happening, they will just resign to humanist nihilism and pure fatalism, and they will accept the submergence.
a) the many consent to what the few suggest (order followers); while ignoring what is perceived (being resistance within natural order).
b) Hong Kong represents a suggested nation; within which the consenting many ignore that nation represents "a people"; yet if the many ignore themselves for the suggestions of the few; then the few define; redefine and contradict at will what represents the nation "Hong Kong".
The issue isn't the few exploit the ignorance of the many without a shred of mercy; it's that ignorance towards perceived is still being ignored by each of the many; who choose to want or not want the suggestions of the few instead.
MEDIA; noun (Latin medius) - "middle". What if suggestion represents the middleman between perception and choice based response to perceived (need) or suggested (want)?
The media doesn't tell you what is; they suggest you to consent to believe that it is; while you ignore what is perceivable.
You respond by choice of "not want" towards the suggestion by the few (coronavirus); which the many chose to "want".
a) want vs not want puts only the many consenting to the suggestion against each other; not the few suggesting it.
b) both side (want and not want) ignore need (perceived) for want (suggested).
c) choice represents the response within perceived balance (need/want); yet is tempted by suggested choices into imbalance (want vs not want).
You don't need to repeat what others suggest; you need to repeat as choice to perceived balance (aka frequency of resistance to velocity).
That's because you're tempted to define yourself by the suggestions of others. It's your consent to the suggested that represents you having less power. Adaptation to perceived inspiration would grow you comprehension and that growth represents the increase of your power aka a more efficient choice through increased comprehension of your perceived surroundings.
Furthermore; "I am completely" ignores that being form (life) within flow (inception towards death) represents being ONE (form) within ALL (flow) aka a differentiation out of sameness.
You lack comprehension; hence representing growth potential; yet that implies you choosing to grow it. Someone who lacks cannot be complete.
That represents using the choice of evaluation to devalue the one wielding it...oneself. That represents your want vs not want choice; while ignoring the need to respond as evaluation (choice) to perceived value (balance).
The highest value in ALL existence represents ONEs evaluation thereof. This isn't hidden information; you willingly ignore to grow comprehension thereof by adapting to perceived inspiration.
Your consent to want or not want any suggested information; causes the conflict of reason (want vs not want). You think that this conflict exists because you already consented to it, and your consent is what others utilize to wield the conflict against you and everyone else. Again...do other life-forms reason about suggested information amongst each other?
A suggested -ism; fueled by those consenting to want or not want it. You choose to not want it; hence representing the opposite...suggested pessimism. Instead of being optimistic (want) or pessimistic (not want) towards suggested outcomes; why not adapt to the momentum of the perceivable now (need)?
In other words..."I want to die" vs "I don't want to die" ignores being alive; hence in need of self sustenance by breathing; drinking; eating; sheltering; regenerating etc.
That translates to "I did nothing", which ignores being done by everything perceivable; hence being the perceiving response to it.
Grow something and it will attract those who resist the temptation to destroy themselves. Those who sustain self coexist with all those who destroy themselves; but you lack comprehension thereof; because you ignore perceived for suggested.