Interesting they both bring up the scope of time the cabal (for lack of a better term) thinks in. They make plans that span generations, plans that span 500 years. They act like they are immortal. So are they? Do they have some 'in' on reincarnation? Because they act like the decisions they make will continue to benefit them personally 100 years from now. Or as Harris posits, are they taking orders from an ET or divine/ demonic third hand. Sounds completely nuts but when you study this stuff long enough, you're repeatedly brought back to this question.
David Keys wrote a book called Catastrophe published 1999 about a climate or volcanic event in 535 AD that altered world history. Anyway he devotes a chapter to the conversion of the Khazars and how they adopted jewish surnames like Levine and Cohen, which was not allowed halachically. Well I remember shortly after the book was published I started seeing articles about discoveries and research that the 'khazar theory had been firmly debunked.' Which I found odd.
the scope of time the cabal (for lack of a better term) thinks in
Perceivable "time" represents the consequences of being moved (tick; tick; tick...); hence us representing form (life) within the momentum (balance) of flow (inception towards death) as the responding center (choice).
To get the many to ignore the perceived ever changing moment(um); they suggest them to consent to past; present and future aka affixed states within a moving system. Those who consent ignoring that which is for that which others suggest was (past) or will be (future); which corrupts comprehension of being within momentum (present).
In short...they don't think in suggested time; they adapt to perceived momentum; while racketeering those who ignore it.
that span generations
The few comprehend what generates aka flow to form (inception); form within flow (life), and form to flow (death) aka ONEs(form) transmutation out of base ALL (flow). Alchemy.
that span 500 years
a) how could a 50-100 year person comprehend 500 years?
b) is counting perceived (need) or suggested (want)? Breathing; drinking; eating; sheltering (needs)...is counting required or could it be a choice between too less and too much (balance) aka enough?
They act like they are immortal. So are they?
Form within flow represents temporary growth (mortal) within ongoing loss (immortal). In other words...immortality represents the flowing base out of which the mortal are formed.
They comprehend that which remains of form within flow aka the ongoing (blood within bloodline); hence rothschild (redshield aka blood defender).
they act like the decisions they make will continue to benefit them personally 100 years from now.
a) now always represents the ever changing moment(um) aka the flowing soil for the formed seed of existence.
b) "insane person" represents suggested meaning; "in sanus" (within sound) and "per sonos" (by sound) represents perceived meaning aka ONE being within; by; out of and in response to the perceivable source of ALL sound; hence having the choice of resonance (need) or dissonance (want).
c) they don't "act" for person; they react to being per sonos (by sound).
are they taking orders
The natural order for form represents flow aka life being moved from inception towards death; which implies being temporary resistance (form) to the natural order of ongoing velocity (flow). The few resist the perceived natural order for the sustenance of life; while suggesting the many to follow suggested orders towards death.
ET
Aka "extra terra" (more form)
divine
Flow (divine) Form (mortal). "half human, half divine" represents form (human) within the momentum (balance) of flow (divine).
demon
a) DE'MON, noun - "a spirit, or immaterial being, holding a middle place between men and divine" from SPIRIT; noun (Latin spiro) - "to breathe" aka form to flow adaptation.
b) dai-mon- "divider, provider" aka ALL flow self segregates into each ONE form; hence representing the divider (ALL to ONE) and provider (ALL for ONE).
Sounds completely nuts
Like an "insane person"?
you're repeatedly brought back to this question.
a) repetition represents frequency of resistance (form) through adaptation by choice to balance.
b) quest implies outcome orientation; yet life isn't outcome oriented (death); but a response to origin (balance); while balancing as choice until predefined outcome. Instead of seeking answers to questions; grow ONEs comprehension of ALL already perceivable.
David Keys wrote
Why give (((david))) the "key" to your mind (memory) by consenting to his suggested information (from within form); while ignoring to grow comprehension by adaptation to perceived inspiration (from within spirit)?
altered world history
a) suggestion represents the "alternative" to perception...if one consent to ignore the latter (reality) for the former (fiction).
b) suggested his-story leaves out the center of existence...ONE within ALL aka form within flow aka choice within balance aka resistance within velocity aka temporary within ongoing aka growth within loss aka magnetic within electric aka potential within potentiality etc.
All that id represents the accumulation of all that was, and your choice represents the gatekeeper for all that will be...his-story represents suggested fiction; your story represents perceived reality.
how they adopted jewish surnames
Before the suggested word comes the perceived sound. Nature moves everything; which communicates inspiration towards the perceiving senses of those within. Word are shaped by choice out of perceived sound; then suggested towards choice of others as idolized meaning; which tempts those consenting to ignore perceived for suggested.
Choice (suggestion) to choice (consent) contract law represents the inversion of perceived balance (offer) to choice (response) natural law.
had been firmly debunked
Nature neither communicates false information; nor does it suggest true information. It offers constantly changing inspiration for adaption.
I don't know if she had a glass or two but she was mispronouncing half of what she was reading lol. Harris took it all in stride and was totally gracious towards her.
Interesting they both bring up the scope of time the cabal (for lack of a better term) thinks in. They make plans that span generations, plans that span 500 years. They act like they are immortal. So are they? Do they have some 'in' on reincarnation? Because they act like the decisions they make will continue to benefit them personally 100 years from now. Or as Harris posits, are they taking orders from an ET or divine/ demonic third hand. Sounds completely nuts but when you study this stuff long enough, you're repeatedly brought back to this question.
David Keys wrote a book called Catastrophe published 1999 about a climate or volcanic event in 535 AD that altered world history. Anyway he devotes a chapter to the conversion of the Khazars and how they adopted jewish surnames like Levine and Cohen, which was not allowed halachically. Well I remember shortly after the book was published I started seeing articles about discoveries and research that the 'khazar theory had been firmly debunked.' Which I found odd.
Perceivable "time" represents the consequences of being moved (tick; tick; tick...); hence us representing form (life) within the momentum (balance) of flow (inception towards death) as the responding center (choice).
To get the many to ignore the perceived ever changing moment(um); they suggest them to consent to past; present and future aka affixed states within a moving system. Those who consent ignoring that which is for that which others suggest was (past) or will be (future); which corrupts comprehension of being within momentum (present).
In short...they don't think in suggested time; they adapt to perceived momentum; while racketeering those who ignore it.
The few comprehend what generates aka flow to form (inception); form within flow (life), and form to flow (death) aka ONEs(form) transmutation out of base ALL (flow). Alchemy.
a) how could a 50-100 year person comprehend 500 years?
b) is counting perceived (need) or suggested (want)? Breathing; drinking; eating; sheltering (needs)...is counting required or could it be a choice between too less and too much (balance) aka enough?
Form within flow represents temporary growth (mortal) within ongoing loss (immortal). In other words...immortality represents the flowing base out of which the mortal are formed.
A sleight of hand (notice of liability) from the few to those with eyes to see: https://www.azlyrics.com/lyrics/queen/princesoftheuniverse.html
They comprehend that which remains of form within flow aka the ongoing (blood within bloodline); hence rothschild (redshield aka blood defender).
a) now always represents the ever changing moment(um) aka the flowing soil for the formed seed of existence.
b) "insane person" represents suggested meaning; "in sanus" (within sound) and "per sonos" (by sound) represents perceived meaning aka ONE being within; by; out of and in response to the perceivable source of ALL sound; hence having the choice of resonance (need) or dissonance (want).
c) they don't "act" for person; they react to being per sonos (by sound).
The natural order for form represents flow aka life being moved from inception towards death; which implies being temporary resistance (form) to the natural order of ongoing velocity (flow). The few resist the perceived natural order for the sustenance of life; while suggesting the many to follow suggested orders towards death.
Aka "extra terra" (more form)
Flow (divine) Form (mortal). "half human, half divine" represents form (human) within the momentum (balance) of flow (divine).
a) DE'MON, noun - "a spirit, or immaterial being, holding a middle place between men and divine" from SPIRIT; noun (Latin spiro) - "to breathe" aka form to flow adaptation.
b) dai-mon- "divider, provider" aka ALL flow self segregates into each ONE form; hence representing the divider (ALL to ONE) and provider (ALL for ONE).
Like an "insane person"?
a) repetition represents frequency of resistance (form) through adaptation by choice to balance.
b) quest implies outcome orientation; yet life isn't outcome oriented (death); but a response to origin (balance); while balancing as choice until predefined outcome. Instead of seeking answers to questions; grow ONEs comprehension of ALL already perceivable.
Why give (((david))) the "key" to your mind (memory) by consenting to his suggested information (from within form); while ignoring to grow comprehension by adaptation to perceived inspiration (from within spirit)?
a) suggestion represents the "alternative" to perception...if one consent to ignore the latter (reality) for the former (fiction).
b) suggested his-story leaves out the center of existence...ONE within ALL aka form within flow aka choice within balance aka resistance within velocity aka temporary within ongoing aka growth within loss aka magnetic within electric aka potential within potentiality etc.
All that id represents the accumulation of all that was, and your choice represents the gatekeeper for all that will be...his-story represents suggested fiction; your story represents perceived reality.
Before the suggested word comes the perceived sound. Nature moves everything; which communicates inspiration towards the perceiving senses of those within. Word are shaped by choice out of perceived sound; then suggested towards choice of others as idolized meaning; which tempts those consenting to ignore perceived for suggested.
Choice (suggestion) to choice (consent) contract law represents the inversion of perceived balance (offer) to choice (response) natural law.
Nature neither communicates false information; nor does it suggest true information. It offers constantly changing inspiration for adaption.
https://www.veteranstoday.com/2022/03/10/the-hidden-history-of-the-incredibly-evil-khazarian-mafia/
The article mentioned just after 10:25.
Ugh, worst 'interviewer' ever. Kept interrupting with her own 'thoughts', particularly when he was explaining something.
I don't know if she had a glass or two but she was mispronouncing half of what she was reading lol. Harris took it all in stride and was totally gracious towards her.