Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Conspiracies Conspiracy Theories & Facts
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

72
HAWLEY: "Do you regret" giving a child porn defendant only 3 months? KETANJI BROWN JACKSON: "I regret that in a hearing about my qualifications to be a justice on SCOTUS, we've spent a lot of time focusing on this small subset of my sentences." HAWLEY: "I regret you only gave him three months" (twitter.com)
posted 3 years ago by meme_kat 3 years ago by meme_kat +73 / -1
15 comments share
15 comments share save hide report block hide replies
Comments (15)
sorted by:
▲ 18 ▼
– Skyrison 18 points 3 years ago +18 / -0

this lady is fucking disgusting. this country is truly dead. we are at the final death throws guys. hope you know this by now....

permalink save report block reply
▲ 15 ▼
– jc99ta 15 points 3 years ago +15 / -0

I don't want a supreme court justice on the bench that is soft on child porn

permalink save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– johnlocke1689 7 points 3 years ago +7 / -0

How is 3 months sentence on a child porn case a small subset?

What about all the other sentences or future sentences of the same category? Are they small subsets too Ms. Judge?

What about the victims, the children, and the mothers and fathers who will seemingly need all the help to get over the mental anguish of the perpetrators. Are they small subsets too Ms. Judge?

What about sex crimes in general along with their victims? Are they small subsets too Ms. Judge?

Or, are we, the people questioning your integrity, small subsets too? A nomination to the highest court in the nation would at least suggest some type of due diligence to assess character traits. Is due diligence a small subset of what's expected?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– Junionthepipeline 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

Me either but the Senate does

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– ScreaminMime 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

Yeah! We want one hard on child porn like the rest of them!

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 10 ▼
– Primate98 10 points 3 years ago +10 / -0

She's being pretty reasonable. I'm sure she's had a lot of cases where a serial killer says, "Hey, is any of this trial going to be about the 99.99% of my time I spend not murdering people?"

permalink save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– FuckTyranny 6 points 3 years ago +6 / -0

Her voice is shaky, it seems like she wasn't expecting this kind of questioning? This woman is a vile cunt.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– DickCactus 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

Good… squirming is the least this cunt deserves.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– IshinRyu 5 points 3 years ago +5 / -0

Well she did follow the law for the district of Columbia. It says up to 10 years, so she gave him the lowest possible she could. What a POS, but hey she is black and female and that's all that matters....right?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Soperp 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

based

permalink save report block reply
▲ 0 ▼
– TooManyOfThem 0 points 3 years ago +1 / -1

Niggers are going to nig.

Idk why anyone thinks blacks are capable of being prominent members of society. All niggers are is tools of their jewish ADL & NAACP masters. If you disagree you're in denial.

permalink save report block reply
▲ -5 ▼
– Krako -5 points 3 years ago +2 / -7

I mean she kind of has a point no? Shouldn't they focus more time on her history of constitutional analysis instead of like 8 cases all of which they were found guilty and served jail time. If she was a pedophile supporter why did they all go to jail she could have just plead them all out no jail time. Getting a felony is basically the end of normal life in society for most people even when they get out of jail. I just don't get the GOP obsession with this line of questioning. Anyone care to explain it for me?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– deleted 7 points 3 years ago +7 / -0
▲ 4 ▼
– user20461 4 points 3 years ago +4 / -0

The way I see it: you can take her word on an issue or judge her by her track record.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Soperp 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

going easy on one child porn user is one too many. disqualifies her

permalink parent save report block reply

GIFs

Conspiracies Wiki & Links

Conspiracies Book List

External Digital Book Libraries

Mod Logs

Honor Roll

Conspiracies.win: This is a forum for free thinking and for discussing issues which have captured your imagination. Please respect other views and opinions, and keep an open mind. Our goal is to create a fairer and more transparent world for a better future.

Community Rules: <click this link for a detailed explanation of the rules

Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.

Rule 2: Don't abuse the report function.

Rule 3: No excessive, unnecessary and/or bullying "meta" posts.

To prevent SPAM, posts from accounts younger than 4 days old, and/or with <50 points, wont appear in the feed until approved by a mod.

Disclaimer: Submissions/comments of exceptionally low quality, trolling, stalking, spam, and those submissions/comments determined to be intentionally misleading, calls to violence and/or abuse of other users here, may all be removed at moderator's discretion.

Moderators

  • Doggos
  • axolotl_peyotl
  • trinadin
  • PutinLovesCats
  • clemaneuverers
  • C
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2025.03.01 - qpl2q (status)

Copyright © 2024.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy