It is a mathematical inevitability that the bank will end up with the vast majority of wealth.
Imagine that there is one bank and one person in a country and the bank prints and loans $100 to the person at 10% interest.
In one year the person will owe the bank $110. Where does the extra $10 come from?
Another person must enter the country either by birth or by immigration and take a loan from the bank, which will print more money from thin air.
Then, with two people each having $100, they must compete between themselves to wrestle at least $10 away from the other to pay off the bank. One person ends up with $110 and pays off the loan, the other will end up with $90 and defaults on their loan. The bank then takes all that the loser had as collateral as real material goods (actual wealth).
Now expand this paradigm to a large country and you see that any bank that wants to keep banking needs an ever increasing population to loan money to, or must open the borders to immigration to prop up their pyramid scheme. As soon as a population begins to dwindle the holes in the system become apparent. The pyramid is built from the top down and every level must be larger than the one above it.
Not only is the entire banking structure a pyramid scheme, they need to tax everyone at higher and higher rates to take money out of circulation so that the money the bankers print will be able to buy more, and the borrowers will be able to do less against the bankers. Taxes simultaneously increase bankers wealth, control inflation, and keep the working class in their place. The more money that is in circulation in relation to the number of people in the system must be kept in check or money becomes worthless through inflation and people will stop accepting money for real goods.
Yes, the bankers can and do print money at their leisure and buy things with it. In the end of a country's economy this causes monstrous inflation as the United State is witnessing it now. Other countries have already been through it. Material assets are more valuable than paper.
Digital/Crypto currency will not be allowed on the banker owned Internet unless it one sanctioned by the Rothschild’s. They will create a "whitelist" of allowed servers on the Internet that will require personal identification to do anything. Personal unlicensed servers will be outlawed.
There is a reason that many Christian and Muslim nations of the past and present banned interest based banking. You can see at its' inception that the bank will end up owning everything. The Federal Reserve is the 8th private bank that has inserted itself into the United States and the Rothschild owned mechanism now controls much of the globe. Our ancestors kicked the bankers out 7 times before that, they simply keep coming. Banks are ultimately why most people left Europe in the first place. The USA ceased to be a sovereign nation in 1913 when Woodrow Wilson helped install our current central bank. The banks pick the candidates, or bribe, bully, or blackmail all the politicians. The stock market is rigged in their favor and they'll pull the rug out whenever they have their new digital currency system ready to go online.
The bankers start wars, fund both sides, and determine who the winner will be based on eugenics. They have historically sided with Muslims against Christians.
https://winsocial.co/c/TheDonald/p/142BOUN9PR/
It would seem that words don't matter.
Matter (life) exists within movement (inception towards death); which is why suggested words (information) are shaped out of perceived sound (inspiration). If one attaches meaning to words; then those who consent to it are idolizing suggested over perceived; which gives those suggesting the power to define; redefine and contradict the idol at will.
Insane Person aka in sanus (within sound) + per sonos (by sound)...the former represents suggested meaning; the latter implies perceived meaning.
Human (Hebrew; form) + Animal (Latin anima aka animated) imply form (human) animated (animal) by flow.
Reasoning (want vs not want) about suggested meaning ignores the implication (if/then) of perceived meaning.