As much as I respect what I've seen of lawyer Thomas Renz, I find 3% death rate on these jabs hard to believe. I could see 0.3%, but VAERS data even when multiplied by an under reporting factor of 40 doesn't come to 3%. That would be 3 million people.
I need to see an actual write up by him going over this data.
Update: As I've seen more channels discuss these findings, it appears to be 3% of the adverse events they studies resulted in death, not 3% of all who took the clot shots. But even that is a disturbing figure for any medication.
The preclinical data released on 3/1 showed 2.5%. To be fair, I'm not sure where he got 3%. I spent some time searching for it and eventually just posted his claims instead.
Makes sense if you factor in people dying after vaccination, but it’s link is obscured.
Perfect example is the Alberta kid who died of COVID19 and totally not the inoperable tumour in his head.
Sorry for the CBC link. It goes on to basically talk up how we should just ignore the facts(such as this kid was dying already) as they don’t want people talking about comorbidities.
I believe that data came from the just released Phizer docs which contained the results of a 3 month study. Sorry, I don't have it saved but someone else here probably does.
Honestly so am I. I only had time to scan the posts as I was busy today. Was it 3% of people with adverse reactions died? Or 3% of all people who got the shot died?
As I've seen more channels discuss these findings, it appears to be 3% of the adverse reactions that they followed that died. Does not appear to be 3% of all who received the shots.
Yeah that's absurd. I believe the correct number is 3% of everyone who had an adverse event, not 3% of every jabbed. IIRC the numbers were 1200 death over 1 million jabbed, so 0.12% death rate.
As much as I respect what I've seen of lawyer Thomas Renz, I find 3% death rate on these jabs hard to believe. I could see 0.3%, but VAERS data even when multiplied by an under reporting factor of 40 doesn't come to 3%. That would be 3 million people.
I need to see an actual write up by him going over this data.
Update: As I've seen more channels discuss these findings, it appears to be 3% of the adverse events they studies resulted in death, not 3% of all who took the clot shots. But even that is a disturbing figure for any medication.
The preclinical data released on 3/1 showed 2.5%. To be fair, I'm not sure where he got 3%. I spent some time searching for it and eventually just posted his claims instead.
Makes sense if you factor in people dying after vaccination, but it’s link is obscured.
Perfect example is the Alberta kid who died of COVID19 and totally not the inoperable tumour in his head.
Sorry for the CBC link. It goes on to basically talk up how we should just ignore the facts(such as this kid was dying already) as they don’t want people talking about comorbidities.
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/edmonton/covid-comorbidities-alberta-spitzer-1.6212510
I believe that data came from the just released Phizer docs which contained the results of a 3 month study. Sorry, I don't have it saved but someone else here probably does.
That recently-released doc shows 2.5%, I believe. I was confused by where 3% came from too.
Honestly so am I. I only had time to scan the posts as I was busy today. Was it 3% of people with adverse reactions died? Or 3% of all people who got the shot died?
Or 2.5%.
As I've seen more channels discuss these findings, it appears to be 3% of the adverse reactions that they followed that died. Does not appear to be 3% of all who received the shots.
Some like myocarditis can kill years later
Queue the Homer "3% so far..." meme
Boy I sure do think I'd notice if 150 of the ~5,000 people I know died.
So do an audit
Yeah that's absurd. I believe the correct number is 3% of everyone who had an adverse event, not 3% of every jabbed. IIRC the numbers were 1200 death over 1 million jabbed, so 0.12% death rate.
how does fractions work