New 9/11 footage
(youtu.be)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (78)
sorted by:
I just assumed from the ignorance it takes to think a plane didn't hit the twin towers, that you are the same level of conspiracy theorist as flat earthers. there is a lot to pick at when is comes the the official story but to say planes didn't happen is next level autism.
You assume too much.
I've been an avid conspiracy theorist since the 2000's. 9/11 was the catalyst that threw me into a conspiracy obsession. It's become a full blown hobby. I have seen pretty much ever video and witness interview that is available on 9/11. It was an inside job for sure but there was definitely planes used at the twin towers.
The Pentagon, on the other hand, did have a curious lack of plane footage...
Why, join the club. Now, since you adamant on your stance and seems to be knowledgeable on the subject:
Can you explain the footage glitches that appear during the second impact?
The lack of deformation on the fuselage as it allegedly impacts the tower?
The 'nose-out' footage that clearly was faked and removed from public view?
Physical impossibility of said airplanes exceeding their max speed at given altitude?
Physical impossibility of said ''pilots'' to perform said maneuvers?
I certainly CAN'T, which is why I'm still on the fence of whether or not they actually bothered to mess up the whole gig by actually using planes, since their shit-for-brains populace probably eat it up without questioning it in the first place. And yes, I know about OP northwoods, the nano-thermite in the dust and that Judy Wood is full of shit.
It is ONLY in the last two years, witnessing first hand, the total and utter idiocy of my fellow man, that I've hopped back on the 'fence' with regards to the no-plane theory.
And sorry for whatever spelling errors - my dictionary is incompatible with this website, English is not my first language and I've just been typing along with little regard for correction, so keep that in mind.
I believe that the aircrafts that were used were not civilian. They were mocked up to look like passenger jets. But still jets, none the less. You can still argue the no plane argument about the Pentagon but WTC had way too many witnesses and the needed a "plane crash" to sell the attack. The 3 buildings that fell in new york, definitely had help with explosives though.
I could point you to some pretty interesting anomalies related to that day that you might not know about, if your interested.