Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Conspiracies Conspiracy Theories & Facts
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

35
New 9/11 footage (youtu.be)
posted 3 years ago by dukey 3 years ago by dukey +38 / -3
78 comments share
78 comments share save hide report block hide replies
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (78)
sorted by:
▲ 1 ▼
– Serpentarius 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

I've been an avid conspiracy theorist since the 2000's. 9/11 was the catalyst that threw me into a conspiracy obsession. It's become a full blown hobby. I have seen pretty much ever video and witness interview that is available on 9/11. It was an inside job for sure but there was definitely planes used at the twin towers.

The Pentagon, on the other hand, did have a curious lack of plane footage...

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– renegader 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

Why, join the club. Now, since you adamant on your stance and seems to be knowledgeable on the subject:

Can you explain the footage glitches that appear during the second impact?

The lack of deformation on the fuselage as it allegedly impacts the tower?

The 'nose-out' footage that clearly was faked and removed from public view?

Physical impossibility of said airplanes exceeding their max speed at given altitude?

Physical impossibility of said ''pilots'' to perform said maneuvers?

I certainly CAN'T, which is why I'm still on the fence of whether or not they actually bothered to mess up the whole gig by actually using planes, since their shit-for-brains populace probably eat it up without questioning it in the first place. And yes, I know about OP northwoods, the nano-thermite in the dust and that Judy Wood is full of shit.

It is ONLY in the last two years, witnessing first hand, the total and utter idiocy of my fellow man, that I've hopped back on the 'fence' with regards to the no-plane theory.

And sorry for whatever spelling errors - my dictionary is incompatible with this website, English is not my first language and I've just been typing along with little regard for correction, so keep that in mind.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Serpentarius 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

I believe that the aircrafts that were used were not civilian. They were mocked up to look like passenger jets. But still jets, none the less. You can still argue the no plane argument about the Pentagon but WTC had way too many witnesses and the needed a "plane crash" to sell the attack. The 3 buildings that fell in new york, definitely had help with explosives though.

I could point you to some pretty interesting anomalies related to that day that you might not know about, if your interested.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– renegader 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

Oh absolutely, please do.

Now, can you explain to me WHY we don't see deformation on the fuselage and why they managed to do the impossible.

You obviously believe that it's airplanes we see and they are powered into the buildings somehow.

Tell me, with your mental gymnastics, how.

permalink parent save report block reply

GIFs

Conspiracies Wiki & Links

Conspiracies Book List

External Digital Book Libraries

Mod Logs

Honor Roll

Conspiracies.win: This is a forum for free thinking and for discussing issues which have captured your imagination. Please respect other views and opinions, and keep an open mind. Our goal is to create a fairer and more transparent world for a better future.

Community Rules: <click this link for a detailed explanation of the rules

Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.

Rule 2: Don't abuse the report function.

Rule 3: No excessive, unnecessary and/or bullying "meta" posts.

To prevent SPAM, posts from accounts younger than 4 days old, and/or with <50 points, wont appear in the feed until approved by a mod.

Disclaimer: Submissions/comments of exceptionally low quality, trolling, stalking, spam, and those submissions/comments determined to be intentionally misleading, calls to violence and/or abuse of other users here, may all be removed at moderator's discretion.

Moderators

  • Doggos
  • axolotl_peyotl
  • trinadin
  • PutinLovesCats
  • clemaneuverers
  • C
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2025.03.01 - ptjlq (status)

Copyright © 2024.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy