New 9/11 footage
(youtu.be)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (78)
sorted by:
Find me footage of physical deformation occuring on the planes, before they vanish into the buildings.
ANY footage will do.
Good luck.
I can do one better. Here is what a plane crash into a wall looks like https://youtu.be/F4CX-9lkRMQ It basically just disappears into the wall.
Lol, you're comparing two very different things and didn't find what I requested (it's a rigged game, I know - because it doesn't exist.... :) ).
Yeah, I've seen this footage being referenced before and do you honestly think an F4 shares the same mechanical attributes of a 737?
Now, I'm no pilot, but it seems to me that a much smaller fighter jet would have an easier time operating at high speeds and low altitudes than a fully loaded 737.
Not only that, but aren't large passenger planes somewhat limited, because of their size, in below 10000 ft because of different atompspheric conditions? I believe it's about 287 mph, ie much slower than that controlled experiment you brought up.
So.. I realize Occam's Razor gets shit on all over the place (and for good reason), but to Dukey's point, given the high population density of the area (and therefore eye-witness accounts & video evidence), doesn't it make sense (from the perspective of the orchestrators) to utilize scale drones (as one possibility) to sell the event in tandem with planted explosives in the building to ensure they collapse? Not going to write-off CGI-only as totally impossible, it just seems like a major pain in the ass when easier options would have been readily available. That said, if they're really 100+ years more advanced than what we think they are (which I'm on board with), my whole argument could be moot.
As far as deformation goes, the wings on a 767 are also the plane's fuel tanks- so there's considerable mass and therefore considerable momentum at the time of impact. Given that the impact happens in the blink of an eye, I'd think being able to observe deformation from early-00's camera technology would be pretty much damn-near impossible.
You wan't an occams razor approach? Here's one: Buildings rigged to blow with conventional use of TNT and thermite (albeit a very rare and technically ''novel'' use of it - check out Niels Harrit and his talks on nano-thermite) all media EVERYWHERE tells you ; two planes, two towers and boom.
It doesnt matter if you didn't see it, everybody else did. The TV showed it. It's the emperors new clothes all over again.
Take a look around today; everybody is afraid of a virus that isn't even DNA sequenced and you need a test to see if you've even got it and the ''test'' doesn't even check for said virus.
I know it's seems off topic, but it's not. It's sabout media deception.
We don't know fuck all about what goes on, we only have a frame of reference that THEY PROVIDE. They can shape anything to be true within this medium.
You can find several HD footage from 9/11, even close ups of the planes impacting the towers.
Download em', take a look frame by frame. Do it yourself, I'm serious.
You cant find the footage. According to official footage, those planes vanished into the buildings. I'm not shitting you.
Everyone with two braincells worth rubbing together and a very basic understanding of physics can tell you that shouldn't happen.