You've misunderstood the argument since you leap to the conclusion that it's wrong without considering what people actually mean beyond "nukes are fake".
It doesn't mean that all the test explosions that happened didn't happen. It's about how the explosions were not nuclear in nature ie. not explosive instantaneous nuclear fission, because that is not possible.
Instead, very large amounts of conventional (and perhaps not so conventional) explosives were detonated, and they threw in some nuclear waste with those explosives. They were some of the biggest explosives ever detonated. And of course there are many witnesses.
Ask yourself, who came up with the concept of a dirty bomb potentially being used by terrorists? The terrorists who first used them back in the forties, that's who.
It's entertainingly written and concise and doesn't make any outlandish claims. In fact you'll see if you read it that controlled, explosive, instantaneous nuclear fission is the outlandish claim.
The witness statements about x-rays and seeing through their hands are likely the very well-known phenomenon of witnesses elaborating fictitiously and adding to their memories with information they learned later.
Nuclear weapons are indeed very real, and once the shroud of mystery disappears around them
while a lot about the original nukes were supposed to work is known, the exact equations and precise function of nukes are top secret and very few people have access to that info. This is very convenient, because they don't function. Private independent individuals have in the interim tried to figure out exactly how they work, There is actually far more information available in various books and memoirs than you might realize. But even so, there is no way to produce, in a controlled fashion or accidentally, a so called "nuclear fission explosion". The concept is absurd. These so called bombs would melt, after a small explosion caused by the conventional explosives that have always been part of the function of alleged nukes: they could never explode through fission. It's a myth, atrocity propaganda declared fact.
Read the book; your assertions are baseless other than "authorities say they are real so they are real". Film and photo evidence is of large amounts of conventional explosives; and even so many of those images are doctored or even faked entirely, to make the explosions appear larger.
Looking briefly at wikipedia - both events occurred during the early days of development of the bomb
The core was intended for use in a possible third nuclear weapon to be dropped on Japan, but when Japan's surrender made this unnecessary, it was repurposed for testing
It sounds like another aspect of the propaganda, to drum up fear of the non-functioning bomb, specifically fear of trying to replicate it. Yes, these guys probably died, perhaps from radiation, probably murder: does this prove that controlled, explosive instantaneous nuclear fission is possible? No.
The weapons are perhaps of a spiritual nature. Possibly a destruction of a soul. Remember the trinity test, now we are become gods, and beware of those that can destroy body and soul.
God made the big boom, but big nose goblin says you are smarter than God for not believing in him. Grug worships big nose goblins as his new Gods now. They made Grug smart.
That's the extent your reading comprehension amounts to. Fingers in the ears and goes lalalala, can't hear you. Glad to have determined you're a five year old mentally.
I think nukes are real.
You've misunderstood the argument since you leap to the conclusion that it's wrong without considering what people actually mean beyond "nukes are fake".
It doesn't mean that all the test explosions that happened didn't happen. It's about how the explosions were not nuclear in nature ie. not explosive instantaneous nuclear fission, because that is not possible.
Instead, very large amounts of conventional (and perhaps not so conventional) explosives were detonated, and they threw in some nuclear waste with those explosives. They were some of the biggest explosives ever detonated. And of course there are many witnesses.
Ask yourself, who came up with the concept of a dirty bomb potentially being used by terrorists? The terrorists who first used them back in the forties, that's who.
Death Object Exploding The Nuclear Weapons Hoax
It's entertainingly written and concise and doesn't make any outlandish claims. In fact you'll see if you read it that controlled, explosive, instantaneous nuclear fission is the outlandish claim.
An older late friend of mine was in the US occupation army in Japan after WWII.
From his descriptions, the atomic bombs were very real.
A soldier being too stupid to know what's really going on?
No. This guy knew how things worked.
Old guy bragging about things to make it seem more impressive. Has never happened before.
The witness statements about x-rays and seeing through their hands are likely the very well-known phenomenon of witnesses elaborating fictitiously and adding to their memories with information they learned later.
while a lot about the original nukes were supposed to work is known, the exact equations and precise function of nukes are top secret and very few people have access to that info. This is very convenient, because they don't function. Private independent individuals have in the interim tried to figure out exactly how they work, There is actually far more information available in various books and memoirs than you might realize. But even so, there is no way to produce, in a controlled fashion or accidentally, a so called "nuclear fission explosion". The concept is absurd. These so called bombs would melt, after a small explosion caused by the conventional explosives that have always been part of the function of alleged nukes: they could never explode through fission. It's a myth, atrocity propaganda declared fact.
Read the book; your assertions are baseless other than "authorities say they are real so they are real". Film and photo evidence is of large amounts of conventional explosives; and even so many of those images are doctored or even faked entirely, to make the explosions appear larger.
Looking briefly at wikipedia - both events occurred during the early days of development of the bomb
It sounds like another aspect of the propaganda, to drum up fear of the non-functioning bomb, specifically fear of trying to replicate it. Yes, these guys probably died, perhaps from radiation, probably murder: does this prove that controlled, explosive instantaneous nuclear fission is possible? No.
The weapons are perhaps of a spiritual nature. Possibly a destruction of a soul. Remember the trinity test, now we are become gods, and beware of those that can destroy body and soul.
Link to a Vice video...I'll pass.
Reputational consequences for their previous work supercedes the genetic fallacy. Also, I refuse to give them any clicks.
Lol "Muh fake nukes"
Maybe our entire existence is fake at this rate....
fake fake fake.
Everything is fake apparently.
You’re not wrong. All is vanity and vexation of spirit.
First thought that came to mind when I saw this post is.. this has got to be a flat earther.
Earth being a spinning globe and nukes were both made up by satanists.
FUCKING KEK.
That's the extent your reading comprehension amounts to. Fingers in the ears and goes lalalala, can't hear you. Glad to have determined you're a five year old mentally.
You're obviously a retard.
Bombs and explosions are real. Nukes are fake. Wow, that was hard.