I can stand on my reputation here. I also posted my strategy and will elaborate at c/Unspoil from time to time. Currently Scored has entered a "land rush" phase common to any new namespace release, a phenomenon familiar to net watchers for 25 years, and my activities have been modest by comparison.

"My" forums are open to selecting additional mods, however their developing communities suggest (I've already added one who is trustworthy, and will continue). They will remain free-speech havens on the topics selected within the rules given, inviting all views unless there is a broad community desire for tighter rules (albeit the Christianity-based Scores are deliberately kept under the narrower civility rules similar to c/Christianity). We've already seen clear community consensus in favor of the named topic in two or three, and clear community consensus against the named topic in one or two. As an example I didn't create, [c/FurryArt](https://communities.win/c/FurryArt) is pro while c/Furry is anti. Welcome to free speech in the 20s.

My own forums are all sincere in offering free speech, or in a few cases free speech supportive of Christianity. It is my belief that being proactive is the best approach for political purposes on this apolitical forum, including particularly the political purpose of the Republican Party but also seeking to transcend their faults admitted by their own leaders. There is no faking or turning people against conservativism, the Constitution, or limited government going on here. The fact that people exist, often twentysomethings, who enjoy projecting racism when given a free-speech forum (I've defined "racism" carefully before), is an ongoing problem within humanity that experienced moderators do their best to mitigate, and I guarantee you that all eyes are on that problem. Permit me to say "Trust the plan" insofar as Jesus is the planner.