Starvation/disease is more effective, because then you get to take over their shit instead of conquering a burned out pile of rubble and ash and blood and flesh. But a war somewhere can cause starvation somewhere else... so i think a smaller conflict that can fuck up supplychains or be blamed for all ills —is more possible than
Nuclear holocaust.
I think the nWo is in-fighting, there’s so many interests competing— and a lot of their goals are the same... i just hope the true death cultists are beat out by the not-so-bad guys.
I’m not sure about the factions, but i’ll throw some out— a person could be in one or more groups, too:
Jesuits ( spy hats)
Freemasons (black hats)
The international finance sector (little hats)
Nazi 2.0 (4th reich)
Big industry barons (top hats)
Skull and Bones (allied with 4th reich)
Asian ‘illuminati’ (yellow hats)
If the goal is depopulation, then there certainly is a winner.
Starvation/disease is more effective, because then you get to take over their shit instead of conquering a burned out pile of rubble and ash and blood and flesh. But a war somewhere can cause starvation somewhere else... so i think a smaller conflict that can fuck up supplychains or be blamed for all ills —is more possible than Nuclear holocaust.
I think the nWo is in-fighting, there’s so many interests competing— and a lot of their goals are the same... i just hope the true death cultists are beat out by the not-so-bad guys. I’m not sure about the factions, but i’ll throw some out— a person could be in one or more groups, too:
Jesuits ( spy hats) Freemasons (black hats) The international finance sector (little hats) Nazi 2.0 (4th reich) Big industry barons (top hats) Skull and Bones (allied with 4th reich) Asian ‘illuminati’ (yellow hats)
...and many more.
A predictable eventuality. I sure hope you're right about them wanting to keep our infrastructure intact.