We had this discussion once. You are taking for granted they didnt isolate a virus, or that a virus doesn't exist at all, while I guess Im taking for granted the Chinese vaccine is a traditional vaccine and that traditional technology vaccines are somewhat ok.
You won't change my mind only by repeating it. Give me some info, context, resource... how to view things into perspective...
You are taking for granted they didnt isolate a virus, or that a virus doesn't exist at all
Until somebody present to scientific community pure virus particles without any contaminants that will show declared properties, the question of virus existence will remain unresolved.
It is impossible to prove that something does not exist, so, the proof of existence is necessary to say that something really exist. We still have no such proof. Today is completely unknown does SARS-CoV-2 exists or not.
You can't create traditional vaccine without proof of virus existence.
Give me some info, context, resource...
Nobody could prove that something does not exist. It is impossible. So, proofs are on the ones who contend that something exist.
You could start from a scientifc paper with description of SARS-CoV-2 isolation. Not the garbage about playing with dead monkey kidneys soup, but something with "filtering", "centrifuge", "purity of our virus sample is 95%", EMI of multiple identical particles without anything else, etc.
Even to start a discussion about traditional vaccine we absolutely need a solid proof of virus existence. It is completely senseless to talk about traditional vaccine if we don't know yet, if virus exists or not.
It's like to talk about specific weapon against aliens without solid proof that aliens exists. Could be fun, but completely senseless.
We had this discussion once. You are taking for granted they didnt isolate a virus, or that a virus doesn't exist at all, while I guess Im taking for granted the Chinese vaccine is a traditional vaccine and that traditional technology vaccines are somewhat ok.
You won't change my mind only by repeating it. Give me some info, context, resource... how to view things into perspective...
Until somebody present to scientific community pure virus particles without any contaminants that will show declared properties, the question of virus existence will remain unresolved.
It is impossible to prove that something does not exist, so, the proof of existence is necessary to say that something really exist. We still have no such proof. Today is completely unknown does SARS-CoV-2 exists or not.
You can't create traditional vaccine without proof of virus existence.
Nobody could prove that something does not exist. It is impossible. So, proofs are on the ones who contend that something exist.
You could start from a scientifc paper with description of SARS-CoV-2 isolation. Not the garbage about playing with dead monkey kidneys soup, but something with "filtering", "centrifuge", "purity of our virus sample is 95%", EMI of multiple identical particles without anything else, etc.
Even to start a discussion about traditional vaccine we absolutely need a solid proof of virus existence. It is completely senseless to talk about traditional vaccine if we don't know yet, if virus exists or not.
It's like to talk about specific weapon against aliens without solid proof that aliens exists. Could be fun, but completely senseless.