Electronics, especially weakly shielded and protected, easily could be damaged with EMI, but that EMI will do nothing for human. Humans are very resistant to all that elcetromagnetic things.
As for van Allen belts, you have to spend months in inner one to get radiation dose significant enough to do real harm. If you pass it in hours, you will hardly notice anything. Outer belt is even less dangerous. They are really nothing and all that crap about enormous danger of van Allen belts is just another shitty scare tale to enshure humans will stay on Earth.
There is absolutely nothing impossible in Moon landing and interplanetary flights. The real question is why we still sitting on Earth. That rabbit hole is much more interesting than insignificant question about US Moon landing. It does not matter was it real or hoax. I read nearly everything about Moon hoax, even things you never read (from russian researchers), and now it is absolutely clear for me that it is insane waste of time and brains of critical thinkers. If only all that enormous energy was targeted to the digging in the question about artificial deceleration of human space exploration and identities of who doing it and trying to keep humans from escaping from that planet...
You consent to what others suggest; which represents consent to suggested information; which you uphold within conscious memory. This self imposed memory is what you "think" about, and your consent to their suggestion represents contract law; allowing them to define; redefine and contradict at will what you "think" about aka what suggested meaning you consent to store within your memory.
we flew by the moon
What is the difference between the so called NPC order followers and you suggesting what you "think" about in the name of others (we)?
I am sure we
a) I am...we. Question that.
b) CERTAIN, adjective - "sure; true; undoubted; unquestionable; that cannot be denied".
What if I say "I'm not sure; that's false; I question this; I deny this"? Could it be that either of us simply chose between wanting (certainty) and not wanting (uncertainty) a suggestion (moon-landing) by others? Could it be that the few use suggestion to cause division (want vs not want) among the many; while rebranding the conflicts (sure vs not sure) to keep them divided and ignorant?
Electronics, especially weakly shielded and protected, easily could be damaged with EMI, but that EMI will do nothing for human. Humans are very resistant to all that elcetromagnetic things.
As for van Allen belts, you have to spend months in inner one to get radiation dose significant enough to do real harm. If you pass it in hours, you will hardly notice anything. Outer belt is even less dangerous. They are really nothing and all that crap about enormous danger of van Allen belts is just another shitty scare tale to enshure humans will stay on Earth.
There is absolutely nothing impossible in Moon landing and interplanetary flights. The real question is why we still sitting on Earth. That rabbit hole is much more interesting than insignificant question about US Moon landing. It does not matter was it real or hoax. I read nearly everything about Moon hoax, even things you never read (from russian researchers), and now it is absolutely clear for me that it is insane waste of time and brains of critical thinkers. If only all that enormous energy was targeted to the digging in the question about artificial deceleration of human space exploration and identities of who doing it and trying to keep humans from escaping from that planet...
I believe we went to the moon.
What happened to the link?
Here's something they wrote about it. Check the update for February 8, 2022.
https://www.spacex.com/updates/
More likely, the balloons popped.
a) what's the difference between those believing in the suggested moon landing back then and those believing in the suggestions of the same source?
b) what's more likely in regard to "starlink"...shielded space satellites within magnetic storms or so called jewish cronyism?
You consent to what others suggest; which represents consent to suggested information; which you uphold within conscious memory. This self imposed memory is what you "think" about, and your consent to their suggestion represents contract law; allowing them to define; redefine and contradict at will what you "think" about aka what suggested meaning you consent to store within your memory.
What is the difference between the so called NPC order followers and you suggesting what you "think" about in the name of others (we)?
a) I am...we. Question that.
b) CERTAIN, adjective - "sure; true; undoubted; unquestionable; that cannot be denied".
What if I say "I'm not sure; that's false; I question this; I deny this"? Could it be that either of us simply chose between wanting (certainty) and not wanting (uncertainty) a suggestion (moon-landing) by others? Could it be that the few use suggestion to cause division (want vs not want) among the many; while rebranding the conflicts (sure vs not sure) to keep them divided and ignorant?