Everything I don't agree with is flat earth

It's a weak argument. What's crazy is that the majority of people believe without question that things no one can see with their own eyes, alive or dead, are understood with a high degree of certainty. The medical industry / big pharma thrive on the appearance of certainty and it's monopoly on biological knowledge.

The more I've looked into things though, the more I've found that the "certainty" and "knowledge" is often established through quite arbitrary choices, often made out of ignorance or for political or financial reasons, and which were fraught with bias and assumption. Since this may have been done by someone who was highly esteemed, say, like someone who wins a Nobel prize for their work, that then gets taught as incontrovertible fact to the next gen of students. The entire field of virology appears to be exactly like that.

Medical doctors and scientists are exceptionally well trained, but they are not trained to critically assess prior (now profitable) discoveries, or theories now accepted as fact, and find flaws in them. The medical and scientific establishment abhors that. They are more often taught the exact opposite - you do not do that, and if you do you'll lose your job or funding. I saw someone else say that it's better to think of them as exceptionally well-trained technicians rather than highly intelligent critical thinkers.

This is a quote from Dr. Harold Hillman:

There is a widespread belief that medical and biological research is very successful and, therefore, more resources should be put into it... Since the 1940's, many new drugs have been discovered and developed empirically, intensive care units for dying patients have been set up in most large towns, new antibiotics have been found empirically and modified, transplantation of skin, kidneys and other organs has become routine, cardiac surgery has become a major specialty, steroids have been used for skin diseases, all these have been highly successful applications of simple technologies.

However, we must ask what has been discovered about the genesis of cancer, multiple sclerosis, Alzheimer's disease or schizophrenia. The answer is remarkably little which has helped us to understand the mechanism of the diseases, so that we can design rational treatments for them.

The same may be said about the understanding of the molecular mechanisms by which drugs act; a large amount is known about what they do, but remarkably little about how they act in the living person or animal.

If we leave aside my hypothesis that basic medical, biological and pharmacological research has not been successful because it has not addressed the fundamental problems and assumptions inherent in most of the techniques, the current situation is dangerous because it suppresses free thought, without which the advance of knowledge can only be slow.

Hillman - a biological scientist, expert microscopist, researcher and MD - spent many years trying to tell people that the electron microscope and sub-cellular fractination (among other things) - two core and essential things in virology and microbiology in general - are completely unsuitable for examining or preparing cells, since they are so destructive and altering of biological matter. He was around precisely when the electron microscope first started being used for microbiological examination so he was not brainwashed into believing it was the be all and end all like a student even one generation later would be. He never got round to talking about viruses since his focus was on the diseases he had been studying mentioned above which are not claimed to be caused by viral infection.... yet. But it's rational to make the leap given virology's heavy reliance on those things.

I get a strong truth vibe from it, to be honest. Like lots of people get headaches. Whenever I get one, its because I've been on TV too much, or not drinking enough water, or not getting enough sleep. The headache is not something we "get," its our bodies way of addressing harm we have caused it. And what if that's what all sickness is? That to me seems logical. It doesn't automatically mean viruses are a lie, but the possibility is very sensible to me.

So then you look at viruses. Where's the proof they exist, or that they cause illness and are contagious? Well, if you read their studies purporting to isolate a virus, its 2 pages of unreadable technical jargon. Impossible for a layman to even know the definitions of 100s of words used without extensive training. Seriously, try reading them. The paper us easy enough to read at first, but the moment they describe Isolating The Virus, you will no longer know the definitions of any words. It is impossible to read without extensive training.

That gives me a pattern recognition ping. Things that are true tend to be easily explainable much of the time. It reminds me of economics. Free market, Austrian economics- very clear, very easy to understand, easy to see the truth of it. Keynesian economics- overly complicated, full of jargon, full of unintuitive processes we are just "not educated enough to understand." Trust the experts, trust Paul Krugman. And of course the government benefits greatly from the ideas of Keynesianism, just as they and big pharma benefit from complicated germ theory.

All of this being said, you might be right. It might be propaganda meant to make us look dumb. Frankly, due to the impossibility of really reading and understanding the scientific literature, my fallback stance is to say "I don't know." Which is exactly my stance on Flat Earth.

Flat Earth- simple, intuitive, lots of easy to understand analysis. Round Earth- complicated, full of technical jargon, "you aren't educated enough to understand, trust NASA." I see lots of similarities here.

Since I can't determine if its my own lack of intelligence/education, or if something more sinister is happening, i lean on saying I do not know. But I no longer accept germ theory as a 100% given.

Time for the daily dot win anti-flat earth thread. Bonus points for pointing the finger at masons when they push the virus and globe earth lies. Well done shill, 33 sheckles have been deposited in your good goy account.

Why do some people not get chicken pox? An outbreak at a daycare or school or even in a home will not get 100% of the people. Why not?

Unprotected sex with an hiv+ person does not always transmit hiv. It’s actually quite rare.

Why if the virus is present and there is exposure, do some get sick and others do not?

Terrain theory seeks to understand that. Not simply that viruses are not real but that scientists are greatly incentivized to never question a virus’ role in sickness because as is means a new money making drug per every new found virus. Endless money.

But if there are ways to combat illness that have to do with how we care for our bodies and why they are exposed to, much less to profit from. And much more to sue the government for. And sue corporations for.

What if EMFs weaken how our mitochondria produce energy for our cells which leads to increase aging and ailments and reduced efficiency in all our bodily systems?

What if Monsanto chemicals in food and water destroy our gut and our immune system making us more prone to small infections and seasonal illnesses?

What if artificial lights mess with our hormones like we know they do with chickens laying eggs?

There are many environmental factors that are new and abnormal like eating pineapples and bananas in winter in the north. Not possible before. Does that impact our health and our ability to fed off sickness?

What about excessive cold or heat? We never have to experience it anymore with climate controll. Does that harm us?

These are terrain questions

Who benifits from the truth? Um everyone lol. I never understood this train of thinking "medical experts would never lie about anything" and here we are dealing with covid a fake virus. " oh they might have lied about that but they wouldnt lie about everything else". Fucking figure it out bro lol ITS ALL A FUCKING SHAM.. ALL OF IT. Your just scared where this will take you

U W0T?!