Hardly. To make traditional vaccine you need an isolated, pure virus in industrial amounts. But SARS-CoV-2 was never isolated even in small quantities for study. It is impossible to make traditional vaccine if you have no way to get enough cleared, pure virus particles without any contaminants.
They dont need industrial amounts. they need just one virus. You dont know what we are able (officially) to do biologically.
You need an alive virus. You infect cellular cultures, or eggs with it (different viruses grow better in different mediums) and then boom you get as many viruses you want. You then just need to inactivate the virus particles and the vaccine is done. (This is how traditional vaccine technology works. How influenza vaccine is made)
The mRNA vaccine on the other hand is not only experimental, because we have never had mRNA vaccines, but is also DE FACTO gene therapy. You get inoculated with foreign genetic material, that will go inside your cells and obligate your cells to produce foreign proteins, aka the viral proteins. And then your body is supposed to fight these same foreign viral proteins that your body produced! As you can see there are multiple steps that can fail, or worse be co opted by other SECRET ingredients in the vaccine.
Viruses are not alive. They are just a complex chemical substances that trick living cells to copy them. That's all.
You infect cellular cultures, or eggs with it (different viruses grow better in different mediums) and then boom you get as many viruses you want.
Yes. Then you separate viruses from medium and get industrial amouns of viruses as intermediate ingridient of vaccine. It is described in every medicine schoolbook and for each and every virus vaccine was made for, there is a peer-reviewed scientific paper describing whole process of taking a virus, preparing medium, replicating virus, separating it from medium and measuring the purity of result.
But nobody, nowere got any amount of pure, clean SARS-CoV-2 viruses. Not even a dozen of them. SARS-CoV-2 was never isolated. You can't have industrial amounts of virus if nobody nowhere get even few of them.
If you have no industrial amount of viruses you can't do the following:
You then just need to inactivate the virus particles and the vaccine is done.
Simple like that. You can't make a traditional vaccine if virus was not isolated.
It does not matter how and where it was made, was it made at all, and does it exist ever.
Even if you have some created sample, right from the lab, you have to replicate it and then, purify it to get decent amount of viruses to deactivate and make a traditional vaccine.
That process is not differ if initial virus taken from a sick human or somewhere else.
Replicating it and getting a pure virus suspension is a key procedure in making a traditional vaccine. That is why all viruses always was isolated and purified as a first thing scientists do with them. If you study virus, you need a clean, pure sample to study its properties and get an ability to create a vaccine, which is one of the main goal of virus research.
To start a production of traditional vaccine you need technology of creating necessary amount of viruse particles. Kilograms, if not tons of them. If scientists did not describe everything, temperature for replicating, process of medium preparation, exact medium composition, timing of replication, grades and number of stages of filtering, parameters of cenrifuging, solution to store purified viruses, all that stuff, you can;t make a traditional vaccine.
SARS-CoV-2 is the only known virus in the world, that was never isolated. No scientist in the world could tell how to get clean virus suspension. Nobody know how to do it. Since nobody develop technology to replicate and purify SARS-CoV-2 virus particles, there is no any chance to have a traditional vaccine.
If there was any paper with SARS-CoV-2 isolation described, it would had been immidiately published in most respectable journal, multiple scientific labs would had been replicated that paper and published their results confirming the isolation, and every single MSM would had scream about it for months, if not years, to cut down one of the main and solid scientific doubt in all that coronahoax and provide a real scientific base for it. But that was never done
Nobody know how to do it. Since nobody develop technology to replicate and purify SARS-CoV-2 virus particles, there is no any chance to have a traditional vaccine.
Men do many things in secret. "Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.'
If there was any paper with SARS-CoV-2 isolation described, it would had been immidiately published
I think immediately hidden.
You are clearly smart. We simply differ in how we interpret our Unknowns. Спасибо за ваши мысли.
But that not a case in virology. If virologist does not share its work - that means it 100% have something to hide.
Even researchers from Wuhan and US openly published their papers on creating coronaviruses potentially harmful for humans. So, the paper of isolation would had been published too, if it exists.
There is no any logic in openly publishing papers on creation of virus and then hide the paper of its replication and purification, except the only case when the created virus does not work as expected, i.e. can't replicate.
I think immediately hidden.
Publication of virus isolation (real, scientific isolation, not that messing with dead cells soup and unsuitable PCR tests they try to pose as "isolation" for that very specific SARS-CoV-2) paper is a routine, obvious and nearly mandatory thing in world of virology. Even for completely harmless ones. And if for very specific and posed as very dangerous for all humanity virus it was not done immidiately, it is 100% proof that there is a hoax. Either virus does not exist at all, either it does not have declared properties.
In any case, "traditional vaccine" is not possible.
In Russia, one vaccine posed as traditional vaccine (CoviVac) was rolled out on the vaxx hoax wave. Many people agreed to take that traditional vaccine, but it was nearly impossible to find it. However, some people was "lucky" and got that shots. It was a great scandal, when revealed, that in state database of jabbed, all that people who thought that they got a traditional vaccine jab was clearly marked as receinved shitty "vector vaccine" SputnikV (AstraZeneca). Nowdays, that "traditional" CoviVac is discontinued under the reason of "low demand", which is partially true, because nobody who may had agreed to be jabbed with traditional vaccine want to be jabbed with that vector shit.
Hardly. To make traditional vaccine you need an isolated, pure virus in industrial amounts. But SARS-CoV-2 was never isolated even in small quantities for study. It is impossible to make traditional vaccine if you have no way to get enough cleared, pure virus particles without any contaminants.
They dont need industrial amounts. they need just one virus. You dont know what we are able (officially) to do biologically.
You need an alive virus. You infect cellular cultures, or eggs with it (different viruses grow better in different mediums) and then boom you get as many viruses you want. You then just need to inactivate the virus particles and the vaccine is done. (This is how traditional vaccine technology works. How influenza vaccine is made)
The mRNA vaccine on the other hand is not only experimental, because we have never had mRNA vaccines, but is also DE FACTO gene therapy. You get inoculated with foreign genetic material, that will go inside your cells and obligate your cells to produce foreign proteins, aka the viral proteins. And then your body is supposed to fight these same foreign viral proteins that your body produced! As you can see there are multiple steps that can fail, or worse be co opted by other SECRET ingredients in the vaccine.
Viruses are not alive. They are just a complex chemical substances that trick living cells to copy them. That's all.
Yes. Then you separate viruses from medium and get industrial amouns of viruses as intermediate ingridient of vaccine. It is described in every medicine schoolbook and for each and every virus vaccine was made for, there is a peer-reviewed scientific paper describing whole process of taking a virus, preparing medium, replicating virus, separating it from medium and measuring the purity of result.
But nobody, nowere got any amount of pure, clean SARS-CoV-2 viruses. Not even a dozen of them. SARS-CoV-2 was never isolated. You can't have industrial amounts of virus if nobody nowhere get even few of them.
If you have no industrial amount of viruses you can't do the following:
Simple like that. You can't make a traditional vaccine if virus was not isolated.
Why ignore the adenovirus vector shot?
End result is the same
If it was made in a lab, they have full access to this.
It does not matter how and where it was made, was it made at all, and does it exist ever.
Even if you have some created sample, right from the lab, you have to replicate it and then, purify it to get decent amount of viruses to deactivate and make a traditional vaccine.
That process is not differ if initial virus taken from a sick human or somewhere else.
Replicating it and getting a pure virus suspension is a key procedure in making a traditional vaccine. That is why all viruses always was isolated and purified as a first thing scientists do with them. If you study virus, you need a clean, pure sample to study its properties and get an ability to create a vaccine, which is one of the main goal of virus research.
To start a production of traditional vaccine you need technology of creating necessary amount of viruse particles. Kilograms, if not tons of them. If scientists did not describe everything, temperature for replicating, process of medium preparation, exact medium composition, timing of replication, grades and number of stages of filtering, parameters of cenrifuging, solution to store purified viruses, all that stuff, you can;t make a traditional vaccine.
SARS-CoV-2 is the only known virus in the world, that was never isolated. No scientist in the world could tell how to get clean virus suspension. Nobody know how to do it. Since nobody develop technology to replicate and purify SARS-CoV-2 virus particles, there is no any chance to have a traditional vaccine.
If there was any paper with SARS-CoV-2 isolation described, it would had been immidiately published in most respectable journal, multiple scientific labs would had been replicated that paper and published their results confirming the isolation, and every single MSM would had scream about it for months, if not years, to cut down one of the main and solid scientific doubt in all that coronahoax and provide a real scientific base for it. But that was never done
Men do many things in secret. "Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.'
I think immediately hidden.
You are clearly smart. We simply differ in how we interpret our Unknowns. Спасибо за ваши мысли.
But that not a case in virology. If virologist does not share its work - that means it 100% have something to hide.
Even researchers from Wuhan and US openly published their papers on creating coronaviruses potentially harmful for humans. So, the paper of isolation would had been published too, if it exists.
There is no any logic in openly publishing papers on creation of virus and then hide the paper of its replication and purification, except the only case when the created virus does not work as expected, i.e. can't replicate.
Publication of virus isolation (real, scientific isolation, not that messing with dead cells soup and unsuitable PCR tests they try to pose as "isolation" for that very specific SARS-CoV-2) paper is a routine, obvious and nearly mandatory thing in world of virology. Even for completely harmless ones. And if for very specific and posed as very dangerous for all humanity virus it was not done immidiately, it is 100% proof that there is a hoax. Either virus does not exist at all, either it does not have declared properties.
In any case, "traditional vaccine" is not possible.
In Russia, one vaccine posed as traditional vaccine (CoviVac) was rolled out on the vaxx hoax wave. Many people agreed to take that traditional vaccine, but it was nearly impossible to find it. However, some people was "lucky" and got that shots. It was a great scandal, when revealed, that in state database of jabbed, all that people who thought that they got a traditional vaccine jab was clearly marked as receinved shitty "vector vaccine" SputnikV (AstraZeneca). Nowdays, that "traditional" CoviVac is discontinued under the reason of "low demand", which is partially true, because nobody who may had agreed to be jabbed with traditional vaccine want to be jabbed with that vector shit.