I am not Jewish. Nothing to do with me. But I find irony amusing.
There is however only the rule of law. So I purpose the argument. If a road was being built, does it divert around your house. Or does it bulldoze it? No sooner are you genocided, or do you move?
Somehow you're presuming you had some other ownership? It was Jerusalem or Palestine or another failed city state under its former Empire? Today it's a country with the rule of law.
BTW today's so called israel does not have real rule of law, it just has some supremacist jews showing the world what they will do to the goyim. Under their "law" a Palestinian is less than an animal. Even African jews are treated less than Ashkinazi jews.
I am not Jewish. Nothing to do with me. But I find irony amusing.
There is however only the rule of law. So I purpose the argument. If a road was being built, does it divert around your house. Or does it bulldoze it? No sooner are you genocided, or do you move?
Somehow you're presuming you had some other ownership? It was Jerusalem or Palestine or another failed city state under its former Empire? Today it's a country with the rule of law.
BTW today's so called israel does not have real rule of law, it just has some supremacist jews showing the world what they will do to the goyim. Under their "law" a Palestinian is less than an animal. Even African jews are treated less than Ashkinazi jews.
It has Israeli law. The nation/country that is present. Not some other province of another bygone Empire.
I just wanted an argument. Never group think, and mass formation psychosis. But how can you possibly convince to agree with a territory?