The Nuremberg trials were against war criminals, held at war crime tribunals. I won't debate the why and what not. But prior to WW2 there was virtually no human rights. Nothing stopping slavery. Despite it being abolished. Your government sending you into a chaingang for a petty crime for life. Where every prison, asylum, hospital, school often had mass graves on site and even incinerators prior to WW2. The procedure of lobotomy won the Nobel Peace prize prior to WW2. The USA didn't stop electro shock therapy for its inmates until the 70s?
Ridiculous misconception, but the argument is not without merit. Although it has to be challenged prior to an assumed conspiracy and then it's possibly at completely different courts.
There is at the Hague, the human rights court, and other international criminal courts, as well as war crimes. But internationally not every nation is its members and not every nation complies with its rulings.
There hasn't been a war-crime. It requires war. Or the proof of warfare. Creating, war crimes. Hence Nuremberg only becomes loosely associated rhetoric where in essence it shaped the creation of human rights.
No it does not necessarily cover the question of vaccination. But for any other trial to commence. The vaccine/s have to be proved to be ineffective and lethal first. Then you can argue against individuals, or the institutions that practiced it, and the protocols enforced by them.
The vaccines haven't, not completely by a majority of global courts yet. Causing a larger UN ruling. The WHO are still predicting variants.
I agree some are in court's currently globally, perhaps somewhere might have ruled on them already, and some nations have stopped certain vaccine usage, others are now possibly even rejecting their use, and others are lifting all their restrictions, dropping the boosters. But until they are out of practice and their mandates completely defeated, they're still being practiced by a global majority.
I can agree that on a case by case basis they have been proved lethal to the said cases, where perhaps some form of compensation was granted. It however really hasn't changed the policy of vaccinating with them in the global majority of nations. Because offically the pandemic hasn't ended, it's still coping with COVID. It hasn't prompted liability against their manufactures, they're still profiting off them, or against those authorising them.
Contrary, they're still being advertised as required, preventative, and necessary daily. Where many nations still have immediate travel restrictions. Social media is still on lockdown and COVID misinformation is being deplatformed daily. Look what's happening with Joe Rogan.
If it's proved to be lab made, there might be that kind of tribunal. It's a long shot, but not impossible. Otherwise it's often held in a criminal court. Human rights nationally have also made certain rulings about the enforcement of them on the individual, dropping the mandates, and ruling on personal rights of refusal, but it hasn't stopped certain corporations mandating their employees to take them and their boosters.
The Nuremberg trials were against war criminals, held at war crime tribunals. I won't debate the why and what not. But prior to WW2 there was virtually no human rights. Nothing stopping slavery. Despite it being abolished. Your government sending you into a chaingang for a petty crime for life. Where every prison, asylum, hospital, school often had mass graves on site and even incinerators prior to WW2. The procedure of lobotomy won the Nobel Peace prize prior to WW2. The USA didn't stop electro shock therapy for its inmates until the 70s?
Ridiculous misconception, but the argument is not without merit. Although it has to be challenged prior to an assumed conspiracy and then it's possibly at completely different courts.
There is at the Hague, the human rights court, and other international criminal courts, as well as war crimes. But internationally not every nation is its members and not every nation complies with its rulings.
There hasn't been a war-crime. It requires war. Or the proof of warfare. Creating, war crimes. Hence Nuremberg only becomes loosely associated rhetoric where in essence it shaped the creation of human rights.
No it does not necessarily cover the question of vaccination. But for any other trial to commence. The vaccine/s have to be proved to be ineffective and lethal first. Then you can argue against individuals, or the institutions that practiced it, and the protocols enforced by them.
The vaccines haven't, not completely by a majority of global courts yet. Causing a larger UN ruling. The WHO are still predicting variants.
I agree some are in court's currently globally, perhaps somewhere might have ruled on them already, and some nations have stopped certain vaccine usage, others are now possibly even rejecting their use, and others are lifting all their restrictions, dropping the boosters. But until they are out of practice and their mandates completely defeated, they're still being practiced by a global majority.
I can agree that on a case by case basis they have been proved lethal to the said cases, where perhaps some form of compensation was granted. It however really hasn't changed the policy of vaccinating with them in the global majority of nations. Because offically the pandemic hasn't ended, it's still coping with COVID. It hasn't prompted liability against their manufactures, they're still profiting off them, or against those authorising them.
Contrary, they're still being advertised as required, preventative, and necessary daily. Where many nations still have immediate travel restrictions. Social media is still on lockdown and COVID misinformation is being deplatformed daily. Look what's happening with Joe Rogan.
If it's proved to be lab made, there might be that kind of tribunal. It's a long shot, but not impossible. Otherwise it's often held in a criminal court. Human rights nationally have also made certain rulings about the enforcement of them on the individual, dropping the mandates, and ruling on personal rights of refusal, but it hasn't stopped certain corporations mandating their employees to take them and their boosters.
Good luck