It's called atmospheric refraction. Shock alert - Light bends. Time and time again, retarded fuck wits see something they don't understand, because they have a low IQ, and somehow use this misinformation to extrapolate 'evidence' of a flat earth. Time and time again, these people just show the world how utterly stupid they are.
SIMULA'TION, noun [Latin simulation ] - "the act of feigning to be that which is not"
What if "versus" is not? What if having free will of choice implies being a response to balance (need/want); hence being form (life) within the momentum (balance) of flow (inception towards death)?
What if choosing to ignore perceived balance (need/want) for suggested imbalance (want vs not want) is causing the versus and the belief in not (nothing)?
What if flow implies the ongoing (loss); and form the temporary (growth) within?
It's called atmospheric refraction. Shock alert - Light bends. Time and time again, retarded fuck wits see something they don't understand, because they have a low IQ, and somehow use this misinformation to extrapolate 'evidence' of a flat earth. Time and time again, these people just show the world how utterly stupid they are.
Name one. And don't say "cause I see flat" you are an ant on a giant ball.
No
You are a fuck stick. What happens when you jump up? Air molecules act the same way. Your IQ is really low dude.
Uh what?
Guff fa?, you don't know a gyroscope works in space? What a maroon.
Yeah, I can fuck stick, you can see it live on t.v. you are brain dead.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=86YLFOog4GM
Retard alert
a never ending expanding universe VS a never ending expansive plane both equate to same ultimate conclusion - this shit is a simulation
Go kill yourself and see how much of a simulation we are in.
i would but theres no escape, you just get put right back in
What if "versus" is not? What if having free will of choice implies being a response to balance (need/want); hence being form (life) within the momentum (balance) of flow (inception towards death)?
What if choosing to ignore perceived balance (need/want) for suggested imbalance (want vs not want) is causing the versus and the belief in not (nothing)?
What if flow implies the ongoing (loss); and form the temporary (growth) within?