Aussie govt is officially afraid of free choice
(jssocial.pw)
Comments (16)
sorted by:
The document is 268 pages long.
https://web.archive.org/web/20220115040946/https://www.fedcourt.gov.au/services/access-to-files-and-transcripts/online-files/djokovic/filed-documents/Sealed-Affidavit-Bannister-1512022.pdf
The full sentence is:
However, it does not appear in the 10 page explanation provided by Minister Hawke.
He does specify that Djokovic's opinions on vaccination, rather than just his medical condition, did play a significant role in the decision.
I’m not surprised they think this. Just surprised they said it out loud.
Why should they be afraid? What are you gonna do about this?
i dont think i have ever witnessed such a fast decline to authoritarian naziism like australia and france tbh with ya.... wow
It's fascism, not nazism.
Oh, this is going to piss every member of the Sickest Coshit Cult. I love it.
One cannot resemble (icon) free will of choice; each ONE (form) represents "free" will of choice in response to the "dom"-inance of balance (momentum) within ALL (flow) aka free-dom.
Free implies within dominance; choice implies within balance; icons imply submission by choice to the suggestion by choice of others. The same submission exploited for suggested government aka govern (to control) and ment; from mens (mind).
Positive (want) implies versus negative (not want); hence a suggested conflict of reason (imbalance); while "re-sponse" for choice implies to balance (need/want).
I respond to balance; most others are tempted to respond to what my choice shaped out of balance; hence falling for the temptation to ignore perceived (inspiration) for suggested (information).
a) GIM'MER, noun - "movement or machinery" aka allegory for flow/form.
b) GIMMICK; noun - "an anagram of magic" aka MAG'IC, noun [Latin magia.] - "putting into action the power of spirits"; from SPIR'IT, noun [Latin spiritus, from spiro, to breathe, to blow. The primary sense is to rush or drive.] aka forms adaptation to flow.
"no; not; none; nothing; nothingness" a) implies ignorance of everything perceived for "nothing" suggested, and b) represents another conflict of reason aka no (not want) vs yes (want).
Ask yourself...does reality offer your perceiving senses a "no" state and does it proclaim a "yes" state when communicating to you?
As form (life) your represents a response to flow (inception towards death)...what makes you think that "unnecessary" (lack of need) can exist for form within flow with the need to adapt to constant change?
The way for all form (life) implies being moved from inception towards death through flow, and form perceiving flow aka our senses perceiving the movement of different form implies communicated inspiration. Ask yourself...does perceived movement form words (information) or offer sound (inspiration)?