Aussie govt is officially afraid of free choice
(jssocial.pw)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (16)
sorted by:
Positive (want) implies versus negative (not want); hence a suggested conflict of reason (imbalance); while "re-sponse" for choice implies to balance (need/want).
I respond to balance; most others are tempted to respond to what my choice shaped out of balance; hence falling for the temptation to ignore perceived (inspiration) for suggested (information).
a) GIM'MER, noun - "movement or machinery" aka allegory for flow/form.
b) GIMMICK; noun - "an anagram of magic" aka MAG'IC, noun [Latin magia.] - "putting into action the power of spirits"; from SPIR'IT, noun [Latin spiritus, from spiro, to breathe, to blow. The primary sense is to rush or drive.] aka forms adaptation to flow.
"no; not; none; nothing; nothingness" a) implies ignorance of everything perceived for "nothing" suggested, and b) represents another conflict of reason aka no (not want) vs yes (want).
Ask yourself...does reality offer your perceiving senses a "no" state and does it proclaim a "yes" state when communicating to you?
As form (life) your represents a response to flow (inception towards death)...what makes you think that "unnecessary" (lack of need) can exist for form within flow with the need to adapt to constant change?
The way for all form (life) implies being moved from inception towards death through flow, and form perceiving flow aka our senses perceiving the movement of different form implies communicated inspiration. Ask yourself...does perceived movement form words (information) or offer sound (inspiration)?