The moonshot was a success. The most you can prove with any faked videos is that NASA created staged videos. It doesn't mean the projects were unsuccessful.
I wasn't around at the time, but I'm guessing the spacecraft, things left behind on the moon, radio communications from the moon, large numbers of people participating in the project. They could have gone even without any evidence to show that they did. Proving that a video has been faked doesn't prove it did not happen.
The moonshot was a success. The most you can prove with any faked videos is that NASA created staged videos. It doesn't mean the projects were unsuccessful.
The films and videos were NASA's evidence that they went. Since they are fake, what evidence is there?
I wasn't around at the time, but I'm guessing the spacecraft, things left behind on the moon, radio communications from the moon, large numbers of people participating in the project. They could have gone even without any evidence to show that they did. Proving that a video has been faked doesn't prove it did not happen.
“I’m guessing”
How does radio communication work from the moon, exactly?
How did that phone call take place without delay from the moon to president Nixon?
“They could have gone without any evidence to show they did”
So you’re considering that we would send people to the moon and not bother to record or document it in any way?
https://www.theguardian.com/childrens-books-site/2013/nov/14/sally-gardner-top-1o-fairytales
There’s a link to sally gardners top ten fairy tale books if that’s what you’re into
Antennae? What I'm getting at is that many people on earth should have been in a position to determine the direction the signal was coming from.
I just took a look at that. It appears that there was delay on the moon end of the conversation, and it also appeared largely scripted.
No, just that what they showed the public and published is not necessarily an accurate reflection of the true mission details.