By your first logic, if no one votes who opposition, then wouldn't the evidence of fraud be more clear?
Not at all. There would be no need to cheat, so people could freely watch accurate counts being conducted, the numbers would add up properly, exit polls would corroborate the results, people voting in person would personally witness the absence of vast numbers of people and the election results would be prepared as they are counted rather than waiting for weeks to release the fraudulent results.
Not at all. There would be no need to cheat, so people could freely watch accurate counts being conducted, the numbers would add up properly, exit polls would corroborate the results, people voting in person would personally witness the absence of vast numbers of people and the election results would be prepared as they are counted rather than waiting for weeks to release the fraudulent results.
I don't believe I am making that overestimation. In fact, nowhere have I stated that any system needs to function correctly.