Odd that they refer to Antarctica as “land of fire” and depict it as tropical. We know for a fact that there’s fossils of palm trees in Antarctica so it was one tropical. Conventional explanation is continental drift.
A skeptical bite might be that falsified the map to receive funding for future voyages. This is boring but useful to consider. Here’s why: was more than one voyage funded to this region? If so…
I like thinking about this stuff. Question to address: if there are other lands why are more vessels not down there exploring?
Odd that they refer to Antarctica as “land of fire” and depict it as tropical. We know for a fact that there’s fossils of palm trees in Antarctica so it was one tropical. Conventional explanation is continental drift.
A skeptical bite might be that falsified the map to receive funding for future voyages. This is boring but useful to consider. Here’s why: was more than one voyage funded to this region? If so…
Did your mother drop you on your head when you were a baby? Because the stoopid emanating from your post just made me dumber.