Odd that they refer to Antarctica as “land of fire” and depict it as tropical. We know for a fact that there’s fossils of palm trees in Antarctica so it was one tropical. Conventional explanation is continental drift.
A skeptical bite might be that falsified the map to receive funding for future voyages. This is boring but useful to consider. Here’s why: was more than one voyage funded to this region? If so…
I'll stay right here thanks. I love poking fun at moron conspiritards who believe everything is an illusion and maps from the 1500s are evidence of hidden worlds and alien life forms. Lol. You guys are so pathetic.
Odd that they refer to Antarctica as “land of fire” and depict it as tropical. We know for a fact that there’s fossils of palm trees in Antarctica so it was one tropical. Conventional explanation is continental drift.
A skeptical bite might be that falsified the map to receive funding for future voyages. This is boring but useful to consider. Here’s why: was more than one voyage funded to this region? If so…
Did your mother drop you on your head when you were a baby? Because the stoopid emanating from your post just made me dumber.
wow! what an educated response!
I'll stay right here thanks. I love poking fun at moron conspiritards who believe everything is an illusion and maps from the 1500s are evidence of hidden worlds and alien life forms. Lol. You guys are so pathetic.