You used to be able to buy it on Ebay. Saying it's more liquid now is just wrong on every level.
"It’s more liquid now due to derivatives whereas before the ledger restricted maximum pace of transactions."
That is not the original reason you claimed it to be more liquid. Too which, I would note added restrictions on block size nearly a decade ago artificially caused transaction price increases, and has nothing to do with actual liquidity.
"Who said I supported this?"
You did, when you artificially championed futures s as a milestone for liquidity.
" I’m simply explaining the mechanics."
No. You lied about the mechanisms to push a false narrative.
No what i said was they’re using the derivatives to control price just like they do silver. They’re able to do this because the blockchain is less liquid than the exchanges. That’s not a statement of support. You’re obviously motivated to try to twist my words. Makes me wonder why 🤔
Right. "The nu ugh, you are!" Deference. I did not see that coming. Remarkable in fact.
😐
I would go back and quote you in full, but you won't stop moving the goal posts so I won't.
At this point the only argument I will accept from you is a concession, and admittance of ignorance. As everything you have said here is just fumbling about seeking traction on loose ground.
It’s more liquid now due to derivatives whereas before the ledger restricted maximum pace of transactions.
Who said I supported this? I’m simply explaining the mechanics.
You used to be able to buy it on Ebay. Saying it's more liquid now is just wrong on every level.
That is not the original reason you claimed it to be more liquid. Too which, I would note added restrictions on block size nearly a decade ago artificially caused transaction price increases, and has nothing to do with actual liquidity.
You did, when you artificially championed futures s as a milestone for liquidity.
No. You lied about the mechanisms to push a false narrative.
No what i said was they’re using the derivatives to control price just like they do silver. They’re able to do this because the blockchain is less liquid than the exchanges. That’s not a statement of support. You’re obviously motivated to try to twist my words. Makes me wonder why 🤔
Right. "The nu ugh, you are!" Deference. I did not see that coming. Remarkable in fact.
😐
I would go back and quote you in full, but you won't stop moving the goal posts so I won't.
At this point the only argument I will accept from you is a concession, and admittance of ignorance. As everything you have said here is just fumbling about seeking traction on loose ground.
Not my problem. I can’t cause people to learn.