See the video here: https://www.ntd.com/upcoming-global-covid-summit-nashville_715751.html
Skip to 1:10:15
Apparently, the new omicron variant changes where the virus is infecting, and it seems to be good news.
I thought it was a bit radical to say there is no virus. I trust terrain theory instead of germ theory. There still are artificial biological organisms/viruses that can be created (bio-warfare, population control).
There is propaganda designed to have us look in other directions, and I think that negating many doctor's experience and observations is not wise. That the problem is a virus (artificial or natural), or another type of organism, doesn't really matter to me.
My belief at this time is that the original chimeric virus is real, and I am not surprised if it evolves/changes or a modified version is released.
Ok, that's bullshit.
SARS-CoV-2 has been isolated here, here, here, and here.
And not from "computer models". Read the papers.
The complete genome has been sequenced here, here, and here.
That guy with the PH based cancer cures that goes on and on about viruses and bacteria not existing seems like a huge quack to me, but I haven't looked into it too deeply. I'm assuming you bought into his videos...
I think it's likely Malone is controlled opposition, but this terrain theory stuff is idiocy. When I have an infection, I take antibiotics, it kills the infection. Terrain theorists are the medical equivalent of flat earthers.
Again that bullshit? You choose wrong forum.
In no way this is "isolation". Isolation means to separate object of interest from any other substances.
If you want a description of virus isolation you could easily read it here Here it goes:
See the difference? They finally got a perfectly isolated ChAdOx1 adenovirus supposedly used in AstraZeneca vaccine for further study, including EM and other things. You could also see a EM of isolated virus with identical particles without any garbage in Supplementary Materials Fig.S1
That is isolation. Virus isolation is routine well-known procedure, that used in that paper just as a obvious intermediate step in reserach. Real scientists do it every time when they want to really study some virus. Routinely and without any problems. And that simple and obvious procedure was never done for SARS-CoV-2.
What you falsely throw here as examples of isolation of SARS-CoV-2 is not even near isolation at all. It is just a description of getting some dirty soup of parts of dead monkey cells, antibiotics, antifungicides, and God know what else, where that frauds declare presence of SARS-CoV-2 using PCR tests that can't be used to detect viruses by definition.
All EM's that provided by so-called "scientists" who declare SARS-CoV-2 "isolation" is an image of unidentifiable garbage with inclusion of few particles that posed as a virus. But they are not. Some kidney specialists do that whole fraud procedure of SARS-CoV-2 "isolation" on clean monkey cell, just for lulz, because what they saw on so-called EMs of SARS-CoV-2 they saw constantly studing kidney cells long before coronahoax. They made EM images, specially for dumb idiots, who pose usual kidney cells remnants as SARS-CoV-2. On images you could easily found exactly the same particles that was posed as SARS-CoV-2 virus. Hopefully, this scientific journal is out of propaganda control due to be very specific on kidneys, so, here you still could read that paper and fuck out with your lies.
Please see the following
https://ibb.co/2twDqfN
The below is from Dr Cowan's book Chapter 2. The picture above shows the findings described below.
Here is the essence of Lanka’s experiment, done by an independent professional laboratory that specializes in cell culturing. As seen in this series of photographs, each of the four vertical columns is a separate experiment. The top photo in each column was taken on day one, and the bottom photo was taken on day five.
In vertical column one, normal cells were cultured with normal nu- trient medium and only a small amount of antibiotics. As you can see, on neither day one nor day five was any CPE found; the cells continued their normal, healthy growth.
In vertical column two, normal cells were again grown on normal nutrient medium and a small amount of antibiotics, but this time, 10% fetal calf serum was added to enrich the medium. Still, the cells in the culture grew normally, both on day one and day five.
The third vertical column shows what happened when Dr. Lanka’s group used the same procedures that have been used in every modern isolation experiment of every pathogenic virus that I have seen. This included changing the nutrient medium to “minimal nutrient medi- um”—meaning lowering the percentage of fetal calf serum from the usual 10% to 1%, which lowers the nutrients available for the cells to grow, thereby stressing them—and tripling the antibiotic concentration. As you can see, on day five of the experiment, the characteristic CPE occurred, “proving” the existence and pathogenicity of the virus—ex- cept, at no point was a pathogenic virus added to the culture. This outcome can only mean that the CPE was a result of the way the culture experiment was done and not from any virus.
The fourth and final vertical column is the same as vertical column three, except that to this culture, a solution of pure RNA from yeast was added. This produced the same result as column three, again proving that it is the culture technique—and not a virus—that is causing the CPE.
All the papers use the inoculation of vero (or other) cells to prove cytopathic effects.
Not fulfilling Koch's postulates.
You lose.
not sure who your talking about, but if you wanna have a conversation about "virus isolation" and virology i can give some very real links to some fucking eye opening information thats being "re-discovered". theres alot of stuff (I might make a thread later with links) so if want some scientific information ill give you some links.
this isnt an easy pill to swallow because of how differing it is from the mainstream narrative. A quick example from what you linked was the fact that the process of "modern isolation" doesn't infect isolate the "virus". it was isolated in "Vero cell cultures"
check this out as a starting point https://odysee.com/@DeansDanes:1/cpe-english:f this is Dr. Stefan Lanka, hes a German Virologist whos become dedicated to exposing this 120 year fraud
Dr Sam Bailey, a medical doctor has some excellent recent videos breaking down the myth of isolation. Unfortunatrly it is too medical for the common Joe.
You claimed the virus hasn't been isolated. Did you read the seven papers I linked? You are making shit up. It most certainly has been isolated. That bitchute video means jack squat to me. It would need to be reproduced in a controlled, impartial experiment.
They changed the definition of isolated, to isolate it, your a fool, and should learn about what you preach
not yet im going thru two of em and so far the same issue presents itself. its the process of isolation we use is flawed by design. there is no control.
there taking what they say is a virus, then mixxing it with vero cells which are dead monkey kidney cells and seeing if there is more cell death. obviously there will be. and then just labeling that the virus.
the genetic coding is is also a farce. they take a small portion of DNA and match it with a computer model of the "virus". it just like the whole PCR test. you can find anything in anything.
this was hard for me to grasp at first to. i grouped it into the same shit you did(ie flat earth) but its not. theres a whole area of medicine and biochemistry completely hijacked