I respect Rob Skiba for his flat earth work but I think he goes overboard with his end times theories, like when he talks about "them" using technology to resurrect a king who lived 4000 years ago and the vaccines causing immortality etc. He tends to mingle scripture with sci-fi and thus distorts everything.
But he is correct about refusing the vaccine leading to loss of livelihoods.
If someone believes certain things, their entire credibility is in question because to believe those things one must either be incredibly stupid, incredibly gullible, or have ulterior motives that are not good.
People who believe that Nigerian Prince really will send them millions of dollars are slightly less stupid and less gullible than people who buy into flat earth.
I played Deus Ex when it came out in 2000... it predicted 9/11, the NSA, China's overtaking the US, the Pandemic, the poison "vax" and many other things.
In fact, on the morning of 9/11 my very first thoughts once it was clear that it was not an accident, was that Deus Ex was coming true, lol.
Long story short, I am not saying he is wrong about covid, but he is not the only one to predict it.
I question both the motives and intelligence of ANYONE who promulgates flat earth psyop.
Mine is there is no reason to discredit anyone speaking a truth that is already proven. He only thought the earth was flat it’s not like he is raping and torturing children like the other side.
I was not meaning to discredit the one point. I am simply saying that, in my opinion, believing some things demonstrates several possibilities that all serve to greatly diminish a person's credibility.
Does not mean they are wrong, just that they will mentally be filed as "wrong or lying until proven otherwise."
Say your neighbor decided to build a shed, and you saw him look at a few pictures of sheds then go about randomly tacking wood together in the shape of a shed, but watching you see that he does not know how to use a measuring tape, calculate angles for cuts, attach to a foundation or even properly nail and screw the wood together.
Then he offers to change your car's oil for you... would you let him?
Changing oil does not use any of the same tools and or planning as building a shed, but you would probably doubt his ability to do that right after seeing him stupidly fuck up the other.
You're an idiot. All the signs of revelation have so far happened in order.
Right now we're on the second beast, controlled by the first conveys the "image of the Beast"(television, Fauci) and "those who do not worship the image of the Beast shall be killed." (Even Trevor Noah was called an anti-vaxxer recently and received online threats).
Revelation is right on schedule. The shallow and stupid expect the text to be rendered as written with a bunch of ten-crowned lion-lizards. Grow up. That poetic obfuscation was done deliberately by the apostles to fuck us over now. It's all going to horrible plan.
When you can get past the stigma of flat earth you’ll realize it makes a lot of sense. Skiba is a good place to start especially if you believe the Bible
I live in Phoenix Arizona where the streets are in a N-S-E-W grid. There are times of the year where the sun both sets and rises north of due east and due west, while remaining in the southern part of the sky for its high point.
This doesn't happen unless you have a globular planet.
So do you believe a rock can reflect light hundreds of thousands of mile to millions of miles have you ever seen any rock reflect light as bright as a light? Planets are not what your told and the lights in the sky don’t have anything to do with the shape of the earth. Is the moon a circle yes, is it a ball maybe you can’t tell since we only see one side.
o do you believe a rock can reflect light hundreds of thousands of mile to millions of miles have you ever seen any rock reflect light as bright as a light?
The moon reflects light at a tiny fraction of what is emitted by the sun, first of all. Look directly at the moon, look directly at the sun... the damage to your retina will prove this part.
Also, yes, many rocks are very reflective. Quartz containing rocks in particular. Ever seen Pyrite (fools gold)? It is mirror-reflective. Try talc and gypsum rocks, they were crushed and used to make reflective markings in the past before plastics and polymers.
Planets are not what your told and the lights in the sky don’t have anything to do with the shape of the earth.
There is much of reality that I question or at least consider alternate possibilities for. The shape of the planets is not one because it is either false or pointless, and can be nothing else.
It is pointless in the sense that "simulation theory" is pointless. I will explain: If we are intelligent ai in a 'computer' simulation, then it is pointless to worry over this because it makes no difference and is not actionable... code cannot exist outside a computer, we cannot exist outside the medium of our reality (which is consciousness itself). If this is a simulation, then it is clear that the planets are meant to represent spheres (where in the reality of simulation they are nothing but code) so there is no reason for them not to be, it does not now, nor will it ever make a difference to your life. It is a distraction and waste of mental energy.
The alternative is that this is all false. However if this is all false, that means that all human thought is also false for the foundation of thought is logic. Logic is the use of observation and interpolation to form theories of reality. If all observation is false, all logic is false and we are dumb animals because this implicitly leads to the conclusion that when you look in the mirror, you are seeing a picture related to nothing, and unlike every other person, you have no fave at all.
Since the fact of your own face is, to your own perception, exactly like our knowledge of planets: based upon logic and observing predictable effects upon other objects as well as similarity to other objects: i.e. every other person you see has a face, so logic dictates you must also have one and you can only test this by looking at the result of light reflecting off of your face and onto another object.
Now, if you want to ponder whether the moon is a natural or an engineered object, that is different.
Does for me too. I’m old enough to remember when the FES was a tongue-in-cheek overtly humorous group of geeks with too much time on their hands. The whole thing was co-opted, weaponized.
That being said, Phil Schneider would like to have a word here...
I'm seeing comments he was murdered via ventilator. Disturbingly ironic, if true.
Speaking the truth cost him everything. Everything except the only thing that matters, his soul.
Sad to see the demons celebrating his death when I search his name, but demons gonna demon.
good find
credit due to dollar vigilante, saw this clip in his latest vid.
Dipshits who say it isn't the mark.
If someone needs it to get paid or buy something, that's a Faustian bargain and coercion. Close enough.
I respect Rob Skiba for his flat earth work but I think he goes overboard with his end times theories, like when he talks about "them" using technology to resurrect a king who lived 4000 years ago and the vaccines causing immortality etc. He tends to mingle scripture with sci-fi and thus distorts everything.
But he is correct about refusing the vaccine leading to loss of livelihoods.
Respect and flat-earth are two concepts that never belong together. Only 2 kinds of people push flat earth: feds and idiots that the feds trick.
How does this work exactly and how do you determine if a soul is stolen?
He was Flat Earther.... Unrelated, but it affects credibility for me....
And it's not the mark itself since the 3rd temple hasn't existed yet & antichrist hasn't appeared
The fact that you use that many periods to convey "emotion" instead of being direct affects your credibility to me
He was using an elipsis: ...
So if someone is wrong about one thing they are wrong about everything even if it’s something we are watching in real time?
If someone believes certain things, their entire credibility is in question because to believe those things one must either be incredibly stupid, incredibly gullible, or have ulterior motives that are not good. People who believe that Nigerian Prince really will send them millions of dollars are slightly less stupid and less gullible than people who buy into flat earth.
Fair point but they warned of something we are seeing happen now.
How do you explain that?
I played Deus Ex when it came out in 2000... it predicted 9/11, the NSA, China's overtaking the US, the Pandemic, the poison "vax" and many other things.
In fact, on the morning of 9/11 my very first thoughts once it was clear that it was not an accident, was that Deus Ex was coming true, lol.
Long story short, I am not saying he is wrong about covid, but he is not the only one to predict it.
I question both the motives and intelligence of ANYONE who promulgates flat earth psyop.
Still a fair point
Mine is there is no reason to discredit anyone speaking a truth that is already proven. He only thought the earth was flat it’s not like he is raping and torturing children like the other side.
I distrust evil much more than I distrust a fool
I was not meaning to discredit the one point. I am simply saying that, in my opinion, believing some things demonstrates several possibilities that all serve to greatly diminish a person's credibility.
Does not mean they are wrong, just that they will mentally be filed as "wrong or lying until proven otherwise."
Say your neighbor decided to build a shed, and you saw him look at a few pictures of sheds then go about randomly tacking wood together in the shape of a shed, but watching you see that he does not know how to use a measuring tape, calculate angles for cuts, attach to a foundation or even properly nail and screw the wood together.
Then he offers to change your car's oil for you... would you let him?
Changing oil does not use any of the same tools and or planning as building a shed, but you would probably doubt his ability to do that right after seeing him stupidly fuck up the other.
No kidding about the mark. People need to actually read Revelation, there's a ton of stuff that needs to happen before we see the mark.
The flat-earther stuff disappointed me as well because I felt that his analysis of the pre-flood world and Nephilim was spot-on.
You're an idiot. All the signs of revelation have so far happened in order.
Right now we're on the second beast, controlled by the first conveys the "image of the Beast"(television, Fauci) and "those who do not worship the image of the Beast shall be killed." (Even Trevor Noah was called an anti-vaxxer recently and received online threats).
Revelation is right on schedule. The shallow and stupid expect the text to be rendered as written with a bunch of ten-crowned lion-lizards. Grow up. That poetic obfuscation was done deliberately by the apostles to fuck us over now. It's all going to horrible plan.
This proves that you have never read it.
What other stuff has to happen?
Pick up a bible
Looking Glass technology isn't always 100% accurate.
Why?
When you can get past the stigma of flat earth you’ll realize it makes a lot of sense. Skiba is a good place to start especially if you believe the Bible
I live in Phoenix Arizona where the streets are in a N-S-E-W grid. There are times of the year where the sun both sets and rises north of due east and due west, while remaining in the southern part of the sky for its high point.
This doesn't happen unless you have a globular planet.
Yes it works fine on a flat earth with a small local sun
How does a lunar eclipse work, perchance?
Also, why is every other planet and celestial object round?
So do you believe a rock can reflect light hundreds of thousands of mile to millions of miles have you ever seen any rock reflect light as bright as a light? Planets are not what your told and the lights in the sky don’t have anything to do with the shape of the earth. Is the moon a circle yes, is it a ball maybe you can’t tell since we only see one side.
The moon reflects light at a tiny fraction of what is emitted by the sun, first of all. Look directly at the moon, look directly at the sun... the damage to your retina will prove this part.
Also, yes, many rocks are very reflective. Quartz containing rocks in particular. Ever seen Pyrite (fools gold)? It is mirror-reflective. Try talc and gypsum rocks, they were crushed and used to make reflective markings in the past before plastics and polymers.
There is much of reality that I question or at least consider alternate possibilities for. The shape of the planets is not one because it is either false or pointless, and can be nothing else.
It is pointless in the sense that "simulation theory" is pointless. I will explain: If we are intelligent ai in a 'computer' simulation, then it is pointless to worry over this because it makes no difference and is not actionable... code cannot exist outside a computer, we cannot exist outside the medium of our reality (which is consciousness itself). If this is a simulation, then it is clear that the planets are meant to represent spheres (where in the reality of simulation they are nothing but code) so there is no reason for them not to be, it does not now, nor will it ever make a difference to your life. It is a distraction and waste of mental energy.
The alternative is that this is all false. However if this is all false, that means that all human thought is also false for the foundation of thought is logic. Logic is the use of observation and interpolation to form theories of reality. If all observation is false, all logic is false and we are dumb animals because this implicitly leads to the conclusion that when you look in the mirror, you are seeing a picture related to nothing, and unlike every other person, you have no fave at all.
Since the fact of your own face is, to your own perception, exactly like our knowledge of planets: based upon logic and observing predictable effects upon other objects as well as similarity to other objects: i.e. every other person you see has a face, so logic dictates you must also have one and you can only test this by looking at the result of light reflecting off of your face and onto another object.
Now, if you want to ponder whether the moon is a natural or an engineered object, that is different.
Aliens?
Physics!?
You have to throw out basic algebra and geometry!
And also logic.
Only the theoretical stuff like dark matter
Does for me too. I’m old enough to remember when the FES was a tongue-in-cheek overtly humorous group of geeks with too much time on their hands. The whole thing was co-opted, weaponized.
That being said, Phil Schneider would like to have a word here...
Eventually people will realize that flat earth is real too.