Whenever I look, there's somehow more messages. It's magical. (It's probably because between all the interruptions and random wandering off, it takes me a day's work to write all this. Good thing I'm retired, otherwise I wouldn't have nearly the free free time.)

I do this in increments of a couple of minutes; all throughout the day while doing family; farmstead; fitness and all the other chores.

Want of outcome clouds a lot of things, like when people want to make liquor but they have no chill so they run it too hot and make a fuckup. You can say to 'em "Don't run it too hot!" but they won't listen.

So much suggested education; yet the foundation of perceived balance (need/want) is nearly untouched by the mind of the many. The corruption of suggestion is what makes the form of the liquor so tempting; plus all the liquor induced stashed memories wanting to be remembered and relived.

Comprehending stuff often implies an increase in potential of other stuff also.

Aka the real internal net from ONE into ALL. This is when inspiration is being perceived as different thoughts falling into place; while drawing countless connections.

Most thinking responds to input.

Most thinking is made upon already consented to information suggested by others; hence thinking in languages aka thinking about perceived reality through the lens of suggested fiction. Almost all ego. Only flow puts into form; only one source of all inspiration.

Sometimes though the brain he'll sneak off and go have a thought all his own.

If anything that represents the consciousness trying to respond to inspiration; while being restricted by all the self imposed information.

These thoughts never get word-pointers assigned to 'em on account of... erm... "it's impossible to describe a color to someone who's never seen it". Eh, it's crap, but it's the closest I can get. We'll get back to this. Maybe.

The want to describe to others represents the ignorance towards the need to express ONEself within ALL.

Of course existence doesn't start at "0" (correctly identified as nothing) - existence is an everything thing, and all other things are nothing things (damn that is... a sentence.).

Everything (ALL) and ONEthing within aka less of everything; hence self segregation. Others represent a different ONEthing out of ALLthing. Nothing represents a suggested brand for the ignorance of everything. Have a rare quote: "Word has no inherent value, as it was invented as a counterfeit and fictitious value to represent natural values in commerce." ~timecube

0 and 1 add to 10 (2), and 0, 1, and 2 together give you 3, which is all things (everything, nothing, and all products thereof). Now we're back in the things again and all I can see is stuff.

"Add to"...form doesn't add to flow; it transmutes out of. Your example represents ONEs choice to count the suggestions of other ONEs; while ignoring the input of ALL...which is ONE.

Sure, question enough and one might eventually understand something. Most seem to just get confused.

Because they want answers spoken to them; shaped for them; transmuted out of perceived inspiration for them; suggested as information that was vetted by the collective for the individual. That's not understanding; that's a domesticated slave waiting for food; hence being confused when told to try to grow his own.

There's probably something in here about discernment, vis-a-vis "understanding when to use which tool".

Self discernment implies understanding that choice represents ONEs only tool within the balance of ALL.

Flow has power, of course - houses on riverbanks and all that - but that's why the tumbleweed uses the movement of the air to disperse itself to fertile soils far away.

That represents the temporary adaptation to being moved (resistance of form); not ongoing velocity of flow. Inception/death represents the momentum of flow outside the formed life within.

Fight against inevitability and lose, but make its power yours and succeed.

Against represents the versus of want vs not want; which in your example are rebranded into succeed (want) vs lose (not want). What's inevitable is the outcome of temporary form within ongoing flow; which represents the power of resistance within the power of velocity; which are both utilized by you. Just like with martial arts; you're utilizing the incoming velocity for your resistance.

And if someone starts fixing to redirect momentum that'd fall under the purview of "martial arts" and one would be well licensed to give them a thrashing if that were the case.

The imbalance by others represents ever changing circumstances for ONEs own choice within balance (need/want). Thrashing others for choices implies ignoring to respond to balance as choice; hence ignoring momentum. There's now a majority who are deceived to blame all others for everything; which allows them to keep shirking responsibility over self. All these redirect attempts represent suggestion of want in exchange for consent to ignore need. This is where those of us who understand this can grow ONEs potential for resistance towards the tempting suggestions by others. That growth isn't a thrashing issue (no conflict); but a struggle within balance.

You can't call something a treadmill and also call it not a treadmill, that's just silly.

a) take the "not" out and question different perspectives upon the same origin.

b) SIL'LY, adjective - "proceeding from want of understanding"; hence towards suggested information; yet "just" implies that which just is aka flow for form; hence perceivable inspiration.

Why do I need to construct some complex allegory for something that already is right before my eyes - trying to visualize the current when I'm already floating in the river; it's there regardless of choice; smart choices take it into account; stupid choices are just made randomly. I already said, I don't do struggling. It's tiring! I have no need to go stepping on treadmills because I walk enough simply being about places.

Life represents the struggle to resist velocity; and the pull towards death tires life out. Stupid choices are still made within the same balance (want over need).

Life's just a cup of wine, anyway. Always another barrel somewhere.

But never ONEself again.

If'n a thing contains another thing, they're neither one another's opposites, they're just more things. All these things!

Containing implies ONE within ALL; hence a self differentiation within a momentum (balance); caused by a movement. The thing (ONE) within another thing (ALL) makes them natural opposites to each other; one formed as growth; one flowing as loss; one potential; one potentiality; one limited; one ongoing etc.

Of course one and all aren't two - they're three.

How can everything be a three; when the ONE within is required for counting the ONEness of ALL (everything) as three? Are choice and balance "two" if choice chooses to not count balance?

Not out of nothing, out of an egg. The nothing was, like the everything, in the egg. It's why the egg was such a funny color.

An egg implies containment; which implies inside/outside balance; hence being within the momentum of motion. You put everything into a shell; because you judge it from your limited perspective as the ONE within the momentum of ALL aka a liquid asset within riverbanks aka a choice balancing within natural opposites. These opposites (inception/death for life in-between) represent the internal momentum of ALL energy.

I went out, stood for an hour, and nature suggested to me breatharianism.

If breathing represents a suggested belief (-ism); then how does not believing in breathing affect the need to breathe?

Nothing is full of nothing, as Everything is full of everything.

The "nothing" is suggested; the few use it to put the ignorance of the many towards everything into the "neverending story" told by them..."Ende's books say that The Nothing is in some way controlled by mysterious beings called The Manipulators. He also says that things which fall into the Nothing get transformed into "lies and delusions" in the world of ordinary mortals" And from the theme song..."Make believe I'm everywhere"..."Given in the light" (inspiration)..."Written on the pages" (information)..."Is the answer to a never ending story"

"questioning the source that doesn't suggest" sounds like some manner of advanced soil analytics; groundology.

From the perspective of the seed within...