What makes you do good things? Making "the right" choice, Having a positive(?) thought.
There needs to be a push from a balanced (that is in balance) reference point(?) of being/state of mind. Push towards the positive(?) (omnidirectional/infinite). Well most certainly it depends on which frame you choose, from where you look.
The realization simply being the acknowledgement of the existence of good. The potential. Hey, there's a possibility of/for good.
Does anyone practice/does breathwork/yoga/etc? Tounge on the palate and breathing modes/techniques to control the energy works best for me.
Sailing on the "see" (perception); sailing on the "c" (comprehension); hence piracy (claiming suggested information).
What's the point? Direction; hence flow moving form from inception towards death. The same flow (direction) causes momentum (differentiation); which points out inspiration for form to choose to resist the velocity of flow (balancing).
Together (velocity/resistance aka direction/choice based balancing) they represent (for energy) and communicate (form within flow) self sustenance...the point of existence.
REF'ERENCE, noun - "a sending, dismission or direction to another for information" implies choice to choice exchange of suggested information (choice of want); which then allows the inversion thereof (not want). So referencing vs dereferencing represents yet another rebranded conflict of reason (want vs not want).
Finally; pointer de/referencing exploits the consented to ignorance of balance (want over need) to point at the substitute imbalance (want vs not want). Programming memory locations represents suggestion of these imbalance pointers (fiction over reality aka information over inspiration); and technology is utilized to automate (mimic flow) the pointing out (suggestion of information).
To program memory within technology is used to program memory within consciousness.
Forgetting in terms of memory represents corruption of upheld information; while forgetting in terms of inspiration represents corrupting memory by consenting to suggested information.
Labeling within balance; while ignoring balancing is what allows others to suggest labels. When someone suggests left or right; then the answer is "free will of choice"...not the suggested choices by others. The consequences of ignorance represent the warning for lack of responsibility; yet ignorance tempts to justify those with even more ignorance.
Re-action; which implies as ONE in response to ALL. Having that self discernment implies being evaluation in response to value. ALL value is predefined; ONE evaluates it to balance within it, and flow (value) to form (evaluation) communication implies perceived inspiration by senses. Inspiration (perception) represents ALL value; that ONEs evaluation grows potential (comprehension) out of...unless ignored.
ALL perceivable inspiration represents the data structure; while grammar represents the suggested information by another ONE that proclaims what the perceived means.
As for analyzing...a) taking apart suggested information ignores that ALL perceived inspiration is being communicated to the already differentiated ONE for growth. Question the implication to try to make another ONE smaller to grow ONEself instead of using ALL? b) analyze aka anal aka "exit only; no entry".
That's one setting the balance (work as a boat anchor) as value to evaluate wanted (heavy enough) vs not wanted (not heavy enough) outcome. Meanwhile; is the boat needed or does one use it to get easier access to water; food and shelter? That represents the balance ones choice needs to respond to; no matter what one builds on top of it. As for the anchor weight...responsibility to balance implies the choice to struggle for self sustenance; hence adding more weight instead of falling for the temptation to reason about weights.
The choice that suggests this defines it for the choice that consents to it.
Growth/loss (choice) within now; nu; new (balance); hence per (by) spective (species); which implies form in response to flow.
Adapting to momentum or to your disruption of their momentum.
Individual choice within collective balance.
Aka within the finite (form) of the infinite (flow). A sleight of hand used for that: "till infinity and beyond"
Word implies shaped by choice out of sound perceived and suggested to choice of others as meaning (information) for perceived (inspiration).
Beginning suggests creationism aka out of nothing by unquestionable creator; which represents the inversion of out of everything for ONEs responding transmutation out of ALL.
Ask yourself this...how can one within everything perceive nothing, and how can one perceive creation within everything? Did it came into existence or was it shaped out of preexisting? Suggesting "creation without creator" tempts reasoning about creator (yes or no); while ignoring that one cannot perceive creation (out of nothing); just transmutation (out of everything).
Aka want (sane) vs not want (crazy) reasoning; while ignoring the need for being insane (in sanus aka within sound). Hence INSA'NE, adjective [Latin insanus; in and sanus, sound.] + ASY'LUM, noun [Latin from Gr. safe from spoil.]
Transmutation (ONE) within Port (momentum) of ALL.
In German "Weg" implies both way "Der Weg" and away "weg damit"; hence form (growth) within flow (loss).
CODE, noun - "any collection or digest of laws". Learn to code? No thanks; I'm all set within the laws of nature.
Yet those in modern economics; who don't use money, represent the usurers suggesting it to the rest...if only the point of life isn't about making it; but about sustaining it while getting made.
Notice that responsibility (hard) and temptation (easy) lead towards responsibilities that become easier; hence making it harder to resist temptation...gotta stay within momentum.
DAFF, verb transitive - "to toss aside; to put off" aka ignorance. Also; TECHNOL'OGY, noun [Gr. art, and word or discourse.] - "an explanation of the terms of the arts". How does flow explain itself to the form within? As perceivable inspiration; not as suggested information shaped into wanted technology. The intent behind most suggested technology is to exchange perceived inspiration (1) with suggested information (0) aka everything for nothing.
ONE can get ALL out of every other ONE.
a) getting the maximum value out of a long long internal object seems to imply a female issue...
b) U'NIVERSE, from U'NITY, noun [Latin unitas.] - "the state of being one; oneness". You were made to believe there's 99 problems; but there's only ever ONE.
Yes implies versus no; hence consent to a different brand of the same conflict of reason (want vs not want). The answer to left or right represents left/right (balance) for responding choice.
That's exactly what choice of ignorance ignores...foundation of balance for "responding" choice. Ask yourself why the parasitic few utilize the term ACT'OR, noun - "one that acts or performs; an active agent"? Information (from within form) suggested as performance (by form), and yet their sleight of hand "the show must go on" implies flow.
Understanding response implies self discernment as choice in response to balance...not to the suggested choices of others.
Who told you that they are "trees"? They didn't. The meaning of their life is being communicated through their responses as form within flow. Debate represents contention in words; hence a conflict of reason between wanted vs not wanted idolized meaning; suggested as information by others. "stop" implies the ignorance towards the ongoing (flow) by the temporary (form) within.
And ALL represents balance (momentum) for the ONEs within...for the responding choice of evaluation within the value of balance. Once again would the understanding of response allow questioning of suggested exchange...offer (balance) consent (choice) represents an exchange of what within energy?
ARRA'Y, noun - "order" + CHARACTER, noun - "impression" aka flow upon form.
Measurement aka measuring by choice of mind; which implies perceived input of moving inspiration. ALL represents value; ONE represents evaluation within; out of; in response to. The supposing of suggested meaning and ones consent to it is what fucks us over; because that ignores evaluation for suggestion of value; made by the evaluation of others. I cannot define meaning for you; only you can grow your comprehension of perceived meaning by resisting to consent to suggestions by me. This is why agreement among choices doesn't represent communication; only choice to balance response (resonance) represents communication; and the more are doing this; the more are sharing resonance within the same balance.
Give and you shall receive...just not to other ONEs; but back to ALL. Resisting the temptation to hold onto other form (want) represents adherence to self sustenance (need); hence growing through the incoming power of loss. That's how existence within balance works. The parasitic few call this karmic justice; hence all the sleights of hand for those with eyes to see aka disclosing everything; while resisting to hold onto anything.
a) ANAL'YSIS, noun [Gr. a loosing, or resolving, from to loosen.] - "the separation of a compound body into its constituent parts" aka from compound ALL into constituent ONEs within.
b) the stress comes from ignoring balance (resisting velocity) for imbalance (resistance vs resistance in ignorance of velocity). Consent to suggested learning from others is what causes these internal conflicts of reason (want vs not want). Stress represents the self inflicted trauma within consented to present; caused by past (loss) and future (hope/fear); while resisting velocity represents responsibility as choice to balance. Whatever ALL has to offer (loss); each ONE within can take (growth)...for a while.
c) I could go at ANAL ISIS...but I'm somehow not tempted to do so. If you would like to take a deep dive into that; by all means just relax and loosen up a little...
Responsibility to resist (life) velocity (inception towards death) aka self sustenance. That's why; while beneficial consequences thereof are welcome; yet tempting the ignorance of responsibility.
Form within flow implies being moved; hence in need to adapt to it aka balancing by choice. Try to do nothing within everything and see how that will work (energy) out?
Because ALL is there and ONE is within.
Comprehension of that allows assumption of different perspectives upon collectively perceived.
Then why did you need to consent to the suggestion of others; who branded them "fish", to be able to proclaim there only meaning as such? Without the brand...what does perceiving different form responding to balance within flow imply? Inspiration maybe...like endless potentiality offered at any moment (um) to every potential within that chooses to utilize it?
Giving away indeed...WHISK, verb intransitive - "to move nimbly and with velocity".
Into implies out of; hence ONEs existence (form) out of ALL (flow) and form/flow (balance) out of energy (internal power). Shaping implies choice based response to balance as form (growth) within flow (loss). Loss doesn't shape form; it causes the momentum; that causes form to be able to shape growth; while being transmuted back to loss.
Check into the sephardic heritage within the heart of Oporto to get a whiff about whose revolutionary spirit is pissing into the spirits you consent to ingest...