What makes you do good things? Making "the right" choice, Having a positive(?) thought.
There needs to be a push from a balanced (that is in balance) reference point(?) of being/state of mind. Push towards the positive(?) (omnidirectional/infinite). Well most certainly it depends on which frame you choose, from where you look.
The realization simply being the acknowledgement of the existence of good. The potential. Hey, there's a possibility of/for good.
Does anyone practice/does breathwork/yoga/etc? Tounge on the palate and breathing modes/techniques to control the energy works best for me.
CODE, noun - "any collection or digest of laws". Learn to code? No thanks; I'm all set within the laws of nature.
Yet those in modern economics; who don't use money, represent the usurers suggesting it to the rest...if only the point of life isn't about making it; but about sustaining it while getting made.
Notice that responsibility (hard) and temptation (easy) lead towards responsibilities that become easier; hence making it harder to resist temptation...gotta stay within momentum.
DAFF, verb transitive - "to toss aside; to put off" aka ignorance. Also; TECHNOL'OGY, noun [Gr. art, and word or discourse.] - "an explanation of the terms of the arts". How does flow explain itself to the form within? As perceivable inspiration; not as suggested information shaped into wanted technology. The intent behind most suggested technology is to exchange perceived inspiration (1) with suggested information (0) aka everything for nothing.
ONE can get ALL out of every other ONE.
a) getting the maximum value out of a long long internal object seems to imply a female issue...
b) U'NIVERSE, from U'NITY, noun [Latin unitas.] - "the state of being one; oneness". You were made to believe there's 99 problems; but there's only ever ONE.
Yes implies versus no; hence consent to a different brand of the same conflict of reason (want vs not want). The answer to left or right represents left/right (balance) for responding choice.
That's exactly what choice of ignorance ignores...foundation of balance for "responding" choice. Ask yourself why the parasitic few utilize the term ACT'OR, noun - "one that acts or performs; an active agent"? Information (from within form) suggested as performance (by form), and yet their sleight of hand "the show must go on" implies flow.
Understanding response implies self discernment as choice in response to balance...not to the suggested choices of others.
Who told you that they are "trees"? They didn't. The meaning of their life is being communicated through their responses as form within flow. Debate represents contention in words; hence a conflict of reason between wanted vs not wanted idolized meaning; suggested as information by others. "stop" implies the ignorance towards the ongoing (flow) by the temporary (form) within.
And ALL represents balance (momentum) for the ONEs within...for the responding choice of evaluation within the value of balance. Once again would the understanding of response allow questioning of suggested exchange...offer (balance) consent (choice) represents an exchange of what within energy?
ARRA'Y, noun - "order" + CHARACTER, noun - "impression" aka flow upon form.
Measurement aka measuring by choice of mind; which implies perceived input of moving inspiration. ALL represents value; ONE represents evaluation within; out of; in response to. The supposing of suggested meaning and ones consent to it is what fucks us over; because that ignores evaluation for suggestion of value; made by the evaluation of others. I cannot define meaning for you; only you can grow your comprehension of perceived meaning by resisting to consent to suggestions by me. This is why agreement among choices doesn't represent communication; only choice to balance response (resonance) represents communication; and the more are doing this; the more are sharing resonance within the same balance.
Give and you shall receive...just not to other ONEs; but back to ALL. Resisting the temptation to hold onto other form (want) represents adherence to self sustenance (need); hence growing through the incoming power of loss. That's how existence within balance works. The parasitic few call this karmic justice; hence all the sleights of hand for those with eyes to see aka disclosing everything; while resisting to hold onto anything.
a) ANAL'YSIS, noun [Gr. a loosing, or resolving, from to loosen.] - "the separation of a compound body into its constituent parts" aka from compound ALL into constituent ONEs within.
b) the stress comes from ignoring balance (resisting velocity) for imbalance (resistance vs resistance in ignorance of velocity). Consent to suggested learning from others is what causes these internal conflicts of reason (want vs not want). Stress represents the self inflicted trauma within consented to present; caused by past (loss) and future (hope/fear); while resisting velocity represents responsibility as choice to balance. Whatever ALL has to offer (loss); each ONE within can take (growth)...for a while.
c) I could go at ANAL ISIS...but I'm somehow not tempted to do so. If you would like to take a deep dive into that; by all means just relax and loosen up a little...
Responsibility to resist (life) velocity (inception towards death) aka self sustenance. That's why; while beneficial consequences thereof are welcome; yet tempting the ignorance of responsibility.
Form within flow implies being moved; hence in need to adapt to it aka balancing by choice. Try to do nothing within everything and see how that will work (energy) out?
Because ALL is there and ONE is within.
Comprehension of that allows assumption of different perspectives upon collectively perceived.
Then why did you need to consent to the suggestion of others; who branded them "fish", to be able to proclaim there only meaning as such? Without the brand...what does perceiving different form responding to balance within flow imply? Inspiration maybe...like endless potentiality offered at any moment (um) to every potential within that chooses to utilize it?
Giving away indeed...WHISK, verb intransitive - "to move nimbly and with velocity".
Into implies out of; hence ONEs existence (form) out of ALL (flow) and form/flow (balance) out of energy (internal power). Shaping implies choice based response to balance as form (growth) within flow (loss). Loss doesn't shape form; it causes the momentum; that causes form to be able to shape growth; while being transmuted back to loss.
Check into the sephardic heritage within the heart of Oporto to get a whiff about whose revolutionary spirit is pissing into the spirits you consent to ingest...
Consenting to suggested information; while perpetuating it.
Matter (form) implies being within the balance (momentum) of flow...the ever changing point (moment) of existence.
Simple towards complex represents the hierarchy of energy to flow to form aka self differentiation. Easy/hard represents the balance (momentum) for the responding choice of form within. ONE comprehends the simplicity of energy (ALL) by the perceived complexity of its internal self segregation (which turns out to not be the simplest way to put it...). Let's try again...perceiving differences grows understanding of sameness aka complex back to simple.
Understanding therefore makes the hard (complex) easier (simple); yet the implied growth of potential happens within the ongoing loss of potentiality; so there's complexity to simplify by growing understanding.
In short...choice within balance implies struggle (resisting velocity); while ignoring it causes imbalance; which implies that less resistance still causes struggle; because choice of imbalance still operates within balance.
Symbolism (affixed suggested information); meaning (ongoing perceived inspiration). The choice in-between information (want) and inspiration (need) already implies being the formed representation of flow.
It doesn't communicate affixed numbers (01); it communicates moving ONEs to perceiving other ONEs. It isn't speech to perception; but sound to perception to choice to speech. The want for a translator is based on consent to creationism; while ignoring transmutation.
The former requires the struggle to grow understanding; the latter the temptation of a suggestion. Choose the former and ONE grows; choose the latter and ONE ignores growth for suggested loss by another ONE...a loss obfuscated by a distraction (exploitation of ignorance).
Chain of command suggesting the individual to ignore sustenance of self for submission to collective ignorance.
Once you perceive the few suggesting the many to put dicks everywhere; it goes from comedy back to tragedy.
How much can ONE have? ONE.
And ONEs lack of understanding about most of ALL.
Try resisting to use the ego; hence forming questions without words? This will inspire to directly adapt within momentum; hence enacting a question (mimicking flow) as the answer (responding form). This is where counting becomes handy; since one uses digits to touch stuff.
One can shortcut this by growing understanding of the foundation for all suggested terms (perceived sound reshaped by responding choice of ignorance).
Rich vs poor implies reasoning among the ignorant many; while the few represent those who suggest the value of everything the many are reasoning about.
Would you speak to your own kin unrestricted or fear the ever looming loss of control?
Question why you consent to call it a wallet; when the wall around the suggested value is so easily penetrable by those suggesting? Also; liquid assets don't have to be carried around...
I adapt to what inspires for the sustenance of self. I can do this with anyone or anything; but the less restricted mind of others also adapts; hence shaping less predictable inspiration through the lens of a different potential.
Resting within movement...reloading. Stop would imply arrest progress; which ignores energy. What you're doing is choosing to reduce resistance within the momentum; after you exhausted yourself by mimicking velocity. REST; noun - [Latin resto, from re (response) and sto (stop)]. A parasite sleight of hand for that is stop motion; an "animation" technique.
Twice daily at dawn and midday.
Form represents the state of semi-controlled (choice within balance) flowing.
"keeps" running represents the temptation of holding onto what is offered for utilization (need); not for acquisition (want). One needs to comprehend being processed as form within flow to be able to understand the consequences of holding onto wanted temptations.
Because the 0 was suggested as the substitute balance to count from; while the only real ONE represents the response to balance.
Measuring potential still requires one to respond to the inspiration thereof for growth; while resisting the temptation to want what is suggested for loss.
Give and ones shall receive seems to fit. "ye" is tied to "the" aka the parasitic catch all term as the inversion of natural connotations. They stripped them all out from Latin to Pig-Latin (English) and "the" is what we are suppose to play with.
Expectation (wanted outcome) corrupts receiving the fruits of ones needed labors, and giving requires as ONE in adherence to ALL for the sustenance of self (need); instead of towards others (want). Exponential growth will attract others anyway; who will then be needed for maintenance."I want some of your goat-milk" or "need someone for all that milk? I got some use for it!"
Let's add EXA'MEN, noun [Latin examen the tongue, needle or beam of a balance. It signifies also a swarm of bees.] so that we can both work on a little cluelessness. Does choice represent the beam of balance; or does ongoing flow represent the beam of balance; or maybe both?
From the flow perspective it pushes forward; from the form perspective it resists being pushed away, and in-between (momentum) it sustains duress (?).
Relax aka re (respond) lax (letting go). A sleight of hand for this one...how does Frankie goes to Hollywood "Relax" starts? "Mi-i-ine"..."Give it to you one time, now" and then "Relax, don't do it"..."When you want to go to it".
Meanwhile...work (energy) causes momentum through ongoing motion.
I never caught a boot; nor was I ever around when a boot was caught. Probably an allegory for fishing within flow (inspiration) for better footing (comprehension).
Maybe those who ignore balancing within the momentum of flow; are tempted to consent to suggested substitute flow (booze) within substitute momentum (bottle)?