Historical revisionism is made possible by all those who consent to reason about the suggestion thereof. As long as the many reason about the true vs false of anything suggested; they are engaging in a conflict among each other; while ignoring the few who make all the suggestions.
As form (life) within flow (inception towards death); form implies information (aka within form); flow implies inspiration (aka within spirit).
SPIR'IT, noun [Latin spiritus, from spiro, to breathe, to blow. The primary sense is to rush or drive.] aka form adapting to perceived inspiration by flow; while resisting the suggested information by other form.
The detachment of the ethereal body aka E'THER, noun [Latin oether; Gr. to burn, to shine] represents ignoring to respond to the source of light (flow to form); hence ignoring enlightenment (growth of forms comprehension out of perceived flow).
would not develop a conscience
CONSCIENCE, noun [Latin, to know] + KNOWL'EDGE, noun - "perception of that which exists". That implies perceived inspiration; not suggested information. All suggested information was shaped by the choice of others; which is what one submits to when choosing to consent to any suggested information.
Choice "needs" to respond to balance; not to the suggested choices of others; which represents the temptation to ignore balance.
Example...instead of using your senses to adapt to the behavior of a so called frog aka growing your understanding of perceived movement; you instead consent to what others suggest you the behavior of a frog means. That represents ignorance of perceived reality for suggested fiction, and it a) corrupts your understanding of reality and b) gives those who make the suggestions your consent to define reality for you.
On the bigger scale...every word suggested as meaning for anything within reality; ignores that reality communicates itself through ongoing movement as perceived inspiration towards the senses of the form within.
I wonder if the movie Equilibrium was inspired by this
Equilibrium was basically Orwell's 1984 but with guns and martial arts. lol
It was close to Huxleys Brave New World with the drug suppression
There's like a thousand links to this and they're all about a year or less old.
Historical revisionism is made possible by all those who consent to reason about the suggestion thereof. As long as the many reason about the true vs false of anything suggested; they are engaging in a conflict among each other; while ignoring the few who make all the suggestions.
As form (life) within flow (inception towards death); form implies information (aka within form); flow implies inspiration (aka within spirit).
SPIR'IT, noun [Latin spiritus, from spiro, to breathe, to blow. The primary sense is to rush or drive.] aka form adapting to perceived inspiration by flow; while resisting the suggested information by other form.
The detachment of the ethereal body aka E'THER, noun [Latin oether; Gr. to burn, to shine] represents ignoring to respond to the source of light (flow to form); hence ignoring enlightenment (growth of forms comprehension out of perceived flow).
CONSCIENCE, noun [Latin, to know] + KNOWL'EDGE, noun - "perception of that which exists". That implies perceived inspiration; not suggested information. All suggested information was shaped by the choice of others; which is what one submits to when choosing to consent to any suggested information.
Choice "needs" to respond to balance; not to the suggested choices of others; which represents the temptation to ignore balance.
Example...instead of using your senses to adapt to the behavior of a so called frog aka growing your understanding of perceived movement; you instead consent to what others suggest you the behavior of a frog means. That represents ignorance of perceived reality for suggested fiction, and it a) corrupts your understanding of reality and b) gives those who make the suggestions your consent to define reality for you.
On the bigger scale...every word suggested as meaning for anything within reality; ignores that reality communicates itself through ongoing movement as perceived inspiration towards the senses of the form within.
Smells like bullshit