Sure there are a few morons who don't know any better and fell for it, but the vast majority of the posters want to destroy the achievements of the white man and make anyone associated with conspiracies look like a looney tune.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (45)
sorted by:
Flat Earth versus Heliocentric represents what to you? A suggested conflict of reason between want vs not want; believing vs not believing; good vs bad; truth vs false etc.
What if the parasitic few use suggestions to cause the conflict of reason (want vs not want) as to a) gain control over what both sides are reasoning over; b) to cause division (reason) by suggestion (-isms) and c) to keep both sides in ignorance of need.
Before one can use free will of choice to choose between suggested want vs not want; ones choice responses to balance under natural law aka need/want for form (life) within flow (inception towards death).
Now ask yourself...does one "need" the suggested shape of this world; or does one "want" it? Furthermore...KNOWL'EDGE, noun - "perception of that which exists". What one perceives is inspiration from everything moving; while all the suggested information by others are shaped by their choices out of everything perceived.
Ask yourself again...does one need to believe vs not believe the suggested information from others or does one need to adapt to everything perceived?
In short...resist consenting to conflict (want vs not want), and instead respond to balance (need/want).
I already see everything through the dualistic mind set, so it's not so much that I need a reminder to get into a certain mindset of engaging with need and getting rid of want. It's all just an act, a play, so why not play a few little roles, have a dance here or there.
a) Suggested dualism is the issue; since DUAL, adjective [Latin , two.] - "expressing the number two"; which deceives you to ignore being ONE (form) within ALL (flow), and furthermore that ALL represents ONE in energy.
Two implies ONE using choice in response to ALL perceived to count other ONEs. Nature doesn't offer "two"; it offers every differentiated ONE within ALL.
The -ism of dualism implies your choice of wanting or not wanting the suggested dualism; which then puts you into the conflict of reason (want versus not want) with all the others who consented to the suggested -ism. It's called division (reason) by suggestion (-ism) and gives the few control over both sides of every conflict the ignorant many consent to engage in.
b) As form (life) within flow (inception towards death) it's flow that predefines the balance (momentum) for forms choice of response. The balance for choice represents need/want aka need to struggle for self sustenance as form within flow by choice based adaptation to balance...or the wanted temptation to ignore this for whatever other form is suggesting.
Forms position as choice within the balance (momentum) of flow is what represents the need for self sustenance; while being temporary form (growth) within ongoing flow (loss) makes flow also the constant temptation for form to ignore self sustenance. One cannot get rid of temptation; life needs to struggle to grow within the temptation of ongoing loss.
From the energy perspective...the velocity of flow causes the momentum; within which resisting form gains the temporary potential to grow or choose to ignore it; while being flushed away by the velocity from loss of potentiality.
a) act represents action; which implies EN'ERGY, noun [Gr. work.] - "internal or inherent power"; which is what causes internal balance of loss/growth aka flow/form; which is where each of us represents the re-action to aka the choice based response to balance aka the resonance to perceived sound.
b) the play acting you refer to represents the suggestions of others for which you ignore being the reaction to the acting energy.
c) the parasitic few can only play their roleplay identity games; because the many are ignoring what they represent...ONE within ALL and ALL being ONE in energy. They even suggest a sleight of hand for this to those with eyes to see..."ALL for ONE and ONE for ALL"
d) the few are playing the many; while suggesting them for example to be the players (gamers) of entertainment (enter tame mind) who are in control (holding the controller).
You kind of have to choose between one or the other when making a point, otherwise it's near impossible to converse with someone
What if choice represents the response to balance; wouldn't that imply balance to be the point of choice?
As ONE potential within ALL potentiality offered...did you perceive impossibility or was it suggested to you?
a) CONVERSE, verb intransitive [Latin, to be turned with or about.] Doesn't ALL flow implies every ONE form within to be turned about?
b) CONVERSATION, noun - "general course of behavior". As choice (form) within balance (flow); doesn't choice (form) based resonance to the momentum (balance) of motion (flow) represent the general course of behavior for self sustenance?
c) does intercourse represent needed agreement vs disagreement (reasoning) among choice or does self sustenance predefined by balance (need/want aka procreation/lust) leads choice of natural opposites (female/male) into intercourse anyway (unless effectively corrupted by pornography; entertainment; identity politics; religions; poisoned water+food intake and pharmaceuticals?
Even while fucking up; we somehow still fuck around...both need and want work together (balance and imbalance) to keep the supply of growth potential going steady; no matter how much effort we put into destroying ourselves. Can't fuck with balance; when you're the response to it.
d) consider communication without the use of idolized meaning (words)? Notice the lack of prolonged conflicts of reason (like half a century of pro-life vs pro-choice) among all the other life-forms; yet if you ever spend overnight in the woods; you learn that the resonance of communication just dims a little; yet sustains momentum. Now compare that with holding feuds for millennia (oh vey).