Sure there are a few morons who don't know any better and fell for it, but the vast majority of the posters want to destroy the achievements of the white man and make anyone associated with conspiracies look like a looney tune.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (45)
sorted by:
What if choice represents the response to balance; wouldn't that imply balance to be the point of choice?
As ONE potential within ALL potentiality offered...did you perceive impossibility or was it suggested to you?
a) CONVERSE, verb intransitive [Latin, to be turned with or about.] Doesn't ALL flow implies every ONE form within to be turned about?
b) CONVERSATION, noun - "general course of behavior". As choice (form) within balance (flow); doesn't choice (form) based resonance to the momentum (balance) of motion (flow) represent the general course of behavior for self sustenance?
c) does intercourse represent needed agreement vs disagreement (reasoning) among choice or does self sustenance predefined by balance (need/want aka procreation/lust) leads choice of natural opposites (female/male) into intercourse anyway (unless effectively corrupted by pornography; entertainment; identity politics; religions; poisoned water+food intake and pharmaceuticals?
Even while fucking up; we somehow still fuck around...both need and want work together (balance and imbalance) to keep the supply of growth potential going steady; no matter how much effort we put into destroying ourselves. Can't fuck with balance; when you're the response to it.
d) consider communication without the use of idolized meaning (words)? Notice the lack of prolonged conflicts of reason (like half a century of pro-life vs pro-choice) among all the other life-forms; yet if you ever spend overnight in the woods; you learn that the resonance of communication just dims a little; yet sustains momentum. Now compare that with holding feuds for millennia (oh vey).