These suggested terms represent an allegory for animated form aka life (form) animated by inception towards death (flow). How can flow causing momentum (balance); within which form (life with choice) exist; be a conflict? What if you ignore balance (need/want) for a suggested conflict (want vs not want to be harmed)?
What if those other life-forms don't intent conflict against you; but respond by choice to balance for the sustenance of self?
Interfere (to enter into)...what does that imply for free will of choice? How does one enter the choice of others? Could this be suggestion of choices towards choice? And doesn't suggestion imply consent by choice to suggestion by choice of others?
Now let's change perspective. If you go outside and a pigeon uses you for target practice; then that represents the pigeons choice...yet does it represent a suggestion? Without suggested meaning by the choice of others; is there still a conflict (want vs not want) or do you have to adapt to balance (need/want) anyway? Would reasoning about wanting vs not wanting what the pigeon is "providing" represent the needed way to adapt by choice?
What if the conflict (want vs not want) only exists within oneself when consenting to any suggestion by others; which then corrupts one to perceive reality through the lens of conflict (reason)?
What if we need to adapt to any circumstances; yet are tempted to ignore need for wanted or not wanted suggestions by others? Circumstances imply perceived movement; which our sense receive as inspiration aka pigeon does business; you see it; you respond. Adaptation.
Suggestion implies consent to affixed meaning (information); while ignoring adaptation to ongoing meaning (inspiration). The issue is that I can describe this; but only your choice; used upon inspiration (need) over suggested information (want or not want) can grow your understanding of this. Choosing to believe me does not represent understanding reality.
The issue is that all languages are suggested; hence us having such a headache communicating the self corrupting deception thereof. Real communication doesn't represents reasoning among choice (agree vs disagree over suggested information); but response as choice to balance aka resonance as choice with balance; as form with flow; as ONE with ALL etc.
interfere also means to prevent or to disrupt and that is how I intended its usage
Does life prevent or disrupt being moved from inception towards death; or does it balance while being moved aka being form within flow? What if the parasitic few use suggestion to cause division (reason) so that we consent to attempt to prevent; disrupt those we believe to be our opposition within reason? Aka want vs not want; believer vs not believer; truth vs false; left wing vs right wing and so on?
What if the conflict you perceive and try to defend yourself against; represents a fictitious suggestion (want vs not want); which deceives you to ignore the perceived reality (need/want). When you choose between wanting and not wanting anything suggested; you already made a choice in response to balance...want over need aka ignorance of perceived need for suggested want.
Two objects cannot occupy the same space at the same time.
What if "two" was suggested to you (one) by another (one)? How does nature communicate two to you? Two horses represent you using choice to count one and another one horse.
Bigger picture...as form (life) within flow (inception towards death); are these representing two or flow causing momentum within itself; which allows temporary formation within ongoing flow? What if flow/form represents the internal balance within energy aka the loss/growth balance energy uses to sustain itself?
What if we each represent ONE (form) within ALL (flow); and ALL (flow/form) represents ONE in energy? What if what's missing here represents ONEs understanding of ALL perceived; hence understanding representing growth potential?
What if time (tick; tick; tick...) represents ongoing flow; instead of the suggested affixed states of past; present; future; that deceive form to ignore being within flow?
What if SPACE, noun [Latin spatium, space; spatior, to wander.] represents being form wandering within the momentum of flow?
What if meaning of words are suggested to us to deceive us into ignoring perceived meaning of moving inspiration?
in my journey
If inception defines death for life...is life an outcome oriented journey; or a balance act? What if ignoring to resist the natural order (flow for form) by balancing as choice; causes imbalance among form? An imbalance representing the conflict between wanting vs not wanting the suggested orders from others?
then I have to choose to either go around said obstacle or go through it
Because you want to move on; yet you ignore that you are being moved towards death; hence in need of balancing by choice (adaptation). Whatever happens around you represents inspiration to sustain yourself within balance and temptation to want to fall for aka a balance for your respond as choice.
Both going around and going through the obstacle represents your consent to the suggested obstacle. Why suggested obstacle? Because you consented to the suggested meaning thereof. Look at this...OB'STACLE, noun [Latin obsto, to withstand; ob and sto.]. That implies your choice of resistance; not that something else represents an obstacle. You choose to evaluate something as an obstacle; because you wanted to; and that is what is causing the imbalance.
These suggested terms represent an allegory for animated form aka life (form) animated by inception towards death (flow). How can flow causing momentum (balance); within which form (life with choice) exist; be a conflict? What if you ignore balance (need/want) for a suggested conflict (want vs not want to be harmed)?
What if those other life-forms don't intent conflict against you; but respond by choice to balance for the sustenance of self?
Interfere (to enter into)...what does that imply for free will of choice? How does one enter the choice of others? Could this be suggestion of choices towards choice? And doesn't suggestion imply consent by choice to suggestion by choice of others?
Now let's change perspective. If you go outside and a pigeon uses you for target practice; then that represents the pigeons choice...yet does it represent a suggestion? Without suggested meaning by the choice of others; is there still a conflict (want vs not want) or do you have to adapt to balance (need/want) anyway? Would reasoning about wanting vs not wanting what the pigeon is "providing" represent the needed way to adapt by choice?
What if the conflict (want vs not want) only exists within oneself when consenting to any suggestion by others; which then corrupts one to perceive reality through the lens of conflict (reason)?
What if we need to adapt to any circumstances; yet are tempted to ignore need for wanted or not wanted suggestions by others? Circumstances imply perceived movement; which our sense receive as inspiration aka pigeon does business; you see it; you respond. Adaptation.
Suggestion implies consent to affixed meaning (information); while ignoring adaptation to ongoing meaning (inspiration). The issue is that I can describe this; but only your choice; used upon inspiration (need) over suggested information (want or not want) can grow your understanding of this. Choosing to believe me does not represent understanding reality.
The issue is that all languages are suggested; hence us having such a headache communicating the self corrupting deception thereof. Real communication doesn't represents reasoning among choice (agree vs disagree over suggested information); but response as choice to balance aka resonance as choice with balance; as form with flow; as ONE with ALL etc.
Does life prevent or disrupt being moved from inception towards death; or does it balance while being moved aka being form within flow? What if the parasitic few use suggestion to cause division (reason) so that we consent to attempt to prevent; disrupt those we believe to be our opposition within reason? Aka want vs not want; believer vs not believer; truth vs false; left wing vs right wing and so on?
What if the conflict you perceive and try to defend yourself against; represents a fictitious suggestion (want vs not want); which deceives you to ignore the perceived reality (need/want). When you choose between wanting and not wanting anything suggested; you already made a choice in response to balance...want over need aka ignorance of perceived need for suggested want.
What if "two" was suggested to you (one) by another (one)? How does nature communicate two to you? Two horses represent you using choice to count one and another one horse.
Bigger picture...as form (life) within flow (inception towards death); are these representing two or flow causing momentum within itself; which allows temporary formation within ongoing flow? What if flow/form represents the internal balance within energy aka the loss/growth balance energy uses to sustain itself?
What if we each represent ONE (form) within ALL (flow); and ALL (flow/form) represents ONE in energy? What if what's missing here represents ONEs understanding of ALL perceived; hence understanding representing growth potential?
What if time (tick; tick; tick...) represents ongoing flow; instead of the suggested affixed states of past; present; future; that deceive form to ignore being within flow?
What if SPACE, noun [Latin spatium, space; spatior, to wander.] represents being form wandering within the momentum of flow?
What if meaning of words are suggested to us to deceive us into ignoring perceived meaning of moving inspiration?
If inception defines death for life...is life an outcome oriented journey; or a balance act? What if ignoring to resist the natural order (flow for form) by balancing as choice; causes imbalance among form? An imbalance representing the conflict between wanting vs not wanting the suggested orders from others?
Because you want to move on; yet you ignore that you are being moved towards death; hence in need of balancing by choice (adaptation). Whatever happens around you represents inspiration to sustain yourself within balance and temptation to want to fall for aka a balance for your respond as choice.
Both going around and going through the obstacle represents your consent to the suggested obstacle. Why suggested obstacle? Because you consented to the suggested meaning thereof. Look at this...OB'STACLE, noun [Latin obsto, to withstand; ob and sto.]. That implies your choice of resistance; not that something else represents an obstacle. You choose to evaluate something as an obstacle; because you wanted to; and that is what is causing the imbalance.