Change the perspective of productive vs useless to rich vs poor and question if both conflicts are caused among the many by the few who suggest money as value?
As for WELFARE, noun [well and fare, a good faring] - "exemption from misfortune"...as life being moved from inception towards death; what exactly is one exempt from misfortune in terms of outcomes?
What if productive vs useless represents want vs not want; just like rich vs poor? What if want implies consenting to a suggestion of others; which then causes the versus conflict (reason) between want vs not want?
Ask yourself...if you evaluate something as better or worse; did you define reality by choice; or did you evaluate a constantly changing reality? Look at suggested entertainment...doesn't your evaluation thereof (better or worse) automatically turns into a conflict of reason against those who chose the opposing side? Aren't all your evaluations of suggested entertainment a want vs not want choice for you?
What if the few use suggestion (want or not want) to cause that conflict (want vs not want) among the many?
No one should be exempt from misfortune. Its bad for humans not to suffer and struggle.
a) does inception(beginning) implies death (end) for life (choice within balance)?
b) is any life exempt from death?
c) doesn't life represent the resistance to being moved towards death; hence the struggle of survival by choice of adaptation?
d) what if that which moves life from inception towards death represents ongoing loss; while life represents temporary growth within?
e) "no one" implies you (as one) consenting to believe in suggested nothingness; while ignoring that as one within all you cannot perceive nothingness...or can you? How could one within everything perceive nothing?
better..bad
Can you respond to the reality around you without consenting to the suggested better vs worse and good vs bad conflict (reason)? What if you are outside interacting with other life-forms...if you evaluate them as good or bad; better or worse...will they reason with you; will there be a conflict?
These suggested terms represent an allegory for animated form aka life (form) animated by inception towards death (flow). How can flow causing momentum (balance); within which form (life with choice) exist; be a conflict? What if you ignore balance (need/want) for a suggested conflict (want vs not want to be harmed)?
What if those other life-forms don't intent conflict against you; but respond by choice to balance for the sustenance of self?
Change the perspective of productive vs useless to rich vs poor and question if both conflicts are caused among the many by the few who suggest money as value?
As for WELFARE, noun [well and fare, a good faring] - "exemption from misfortune"...as life being moved from inception towards death; what exactly is one exempt from misfortune in terms of outcomes?
What if productive vs useless represents want vs not want; just like rich vs poor? What if want implies consenting to a suggestion of others; which then causes the versus conflict (reason) between want vs not want?
Ask yourself...if you evaluate something as better or worse; did you define reality by choice; or did you evaluate a constantly changing reality? Look at suggested entertainment...doesn't your evaluation thereof (better or worse) automatically turns into a conflict of reason against those who chose the opposing side? Aren't all your evaluations of suggested entertainment a want vs not want choice for you?
What if the few use suggestion (want or not want) to cause that conflict (want vs not want) among the many?
a) does inception(beginning) implies death (end) for life (choice within balance)?
b) is any life exempt from death?
c) doesn't life represent the resistance to being moved towards death; hence the struggle of survival by choice of adaptation?
d) what if that which moves life from inception towards death represents ongoing loss; while life represents temporary growth within?
e) "no one" implies you (as one) consenting to believe in suggested nothingness; while ignoring that as one within all you cannot perceive nothingness...or can you? How could one within everything perceive nothing?
Can you respond to the reality around you without consenting to the suggested better vs worse and good vs bad conflict (reason)? What if you are outside interacting with other life-forms...if you evaluate them as good or bad; better or worse...will they reason with you; will there be a conflict?
He's a mentally ill philosopher from Flat Earth, inc.
He spams it everywhere he goes.
These suggested terms represent an allegory for animated form aka life (form) animated by inception towards death (flow). How can flow causing momentum (balance); within which form (life with choice) exist; be a conflict? What if you ignore balance (need/want) for a suggested conflict (want vs not want to be harmed)?
What if those other life-forms don't intent conflict against you; but respond by choice to balance for the sustenance of self?