Can anyone with chemistry knowledge explain like I'm five? My knowledge of chemistry is limited to what I was taught in high school 20 years ago... I know graphene is Carbon, but what confuses me is Graphene hydroxide - so these are molecules with hydrogen and oxygen? How can it be one atom thick if it's a molecule with three elements?
0.5-1 nanometer thick layers of carbon based materials consisting of C, O and possibly another element (like N or S) and free-flowing H ions making it 99.99X% pure graphene (Hydr) oxide.
These sheets are like thin razer blades that can cut through endothelial layers (walls of blood vessels) and other biological structures.
Graphene oxide by itself is toxic when injected into humans.
It has interesting physical propertis like radio frequency absorbption in the 2.4 - 6 (+) GHz band and can act as a conductor or become magnetic when doped with another element.
It can be used to assemble electrical nano-sized circuits and influence radio frequence signaling (receiving/emitting) of biological structures.
SCROLL DOWN TO THE WEBSITE BOTTOM to see a VIDEO WITH SUBTITLES EXPLAINING EVERYTHING....
this is the Doctor that was killed shortly after he did a video over the internet...
Dr. Andreas Noack...**
less surface area = more pressure on the tissues. Graphene shards are the thinnest possible razorblade (smallest surface area, thus puts most cutting pressure on the tissues) theoretically and intuitively. The graphene is essentially a 1 atom thick layer of carbon atoms arranged in a hexagonal format with double bonds arranged in a manner that lends to tremendous stability (through resonance if you're interested in reading more).
However the issue is not only the calibration of instruments, it is the fact that there are NO optical instruments that can "see" down to 0.5 - 1 nm.
Some superresolution microscope can get close, but they already work outside visible wavelength of light, thus the images they produce are always computer imaging generated out of reflection spectra and computationally filtered to show some things and leave out other things.
During a research career lasting more than 50 years, I have concluded that the following
procedures are unsuitable for studying the biology of living cells in Intact animals and plants:
subcellular fractionation; histology; histochemistry; electron microscopy; binding studies; use of
ligands; immunocytochemistry; tissue slices; disruptive techniques; dehydration; deep freezing;
freeze drying; boiling; use of extracellular markers; receptor studies; patch clamp measurements;
inadequate calibrations. The main objections to these procedures are: (i) they change the properties
of the tissues being studied grossly and significantly; (ii) they ignore the second law of
thermodynamics;(iii) they produce artefacts, many of which are two-dimensional; (iv) adequate
control procedures have never been published for them.
Can anyone with chemistry knowledge explain like I'm five? My knowledge of chemistry is limited to what I was taught in high school 20 years ago... I know graphene is Carbon, but what confuses me is Graphene hydroxide - so these are molecules with hydrogen and oxygen? How can it be one atom thick if it's a molecule with three elements?
0.5-1 nanometer thick layers of carbon based materials consisting of C, O and possibly another element (like N or S) and free-flowing H ions making it 99.99X% pure graphene (Hydr) oxide.
These sheets are like thin razer blades that can cut through endothelial layers (walls of blood vessels) and other biological structures.
Graphene oxide by itself is toxic when injected into humans.
It has interesting physical propertis like radio frequency absorbption in the 2.4 - 6 (+) GHz band and can act as a conductor or become magnetic when doped with another element.
It can be used to assemble electrical nano-sized circuits and influence radio frequence signaling (receiving/emitting) of biological structures.
**https://bartoll.se/2021/11/graphene-hydroxide-specuulation/
SCROLL DOWN TO THE WEBSITE BOTTOM to see a VIDEO WITH SUBTITLES EXPLAINING EVERYTHING.... this is the Doctor that was killed shortly after he did a video over the internet... Dr. Andreas Noack...**
Yeah I have already seen it, thanks.
less surface area = more pressure on the tissues. Graphene shards are the thinnest possible razorblade (smallest surface area, thus puts most cutting pressure on the tissues) theoretically and intuitively. The graphene is essentially a 1 atom thick layer of carbon atoms arranged in a hexagonal format with double bonds arranged in a manner that lends to tremendous stability (through resonance if you're interested in reading more).
Good pointers.
However the issue is not only the calibration of instruments, it is the fact that there are NO optical instruments that can "see" down to 0.5 - 1 nm.
Some superresolution microscope can get close, but they already work outside visible wavelength of light, thus the images they produce are always computer imaging generated out of reflection spectra and computationally filtered to show some things and leave out other things.
(also 4 attn of u/zeppelincheetah)
Dr. Harold Hillman:
https://www.big-lies.org/harold-hillman-biology/index.html
https://www.big-lies.org/harold-hillman-biology/what-price-intellectual-honesty.htm
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/297b780rk5kvbyx/AABo8GCfCdsD2E0nMHd0H623a?dl=0&preview=Harold+Hillman+2011+Cell+biology+is+in+dire+straits.pdf
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/297b780rk5kvbyx/AABo8GCfCdsD2E0nMHd0H623a?dl=0